Predicting 10-2 Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Using Deep Learning Corrected With 24-2/30-2 Visual Field.
Hashimoto Yohei, Kiwaki Taichi, Sugiura Hiroki, Asano Shotaro, Murata Hiroshi, Fujino Yuri, Matsuura Masato, Miki Atsuya, Mori Kazuhiko, Ikeda Yoko
AI Summary
Deep learning predicting 10-2 visual fields from OCT improved significantly when corrected with 24-2/30-2 visual fields, potentially reducing the need for additional 10-2 tests.
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate whether a correction based on a Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2/30-2 visual field (VF) can improve the prediction performance of a deep learning model to predict the HFA 10-2 VF test from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements.
Methods
This is a multicenter, cross-sectional study. The training dataset comprised 493 eyes of 285 subjects (407, open-angle glaucoma [OAG]; 86, normative) who underwent HFA 10-2 testing and macular OCT. The independent testing dataset comprised 104 OAG eyes of 82 subjects who had undergone HFA 10-2 test, HFA 24-2/30-2 test, and macular OCT. A convolutional neural network (CNN) DL model was trained to predict threshold sensitivity (TH) values in HFA 10-2 from retinal thickness measured by macular OCT. The predicted TH values was modified by pattern-based regularization (PBR) and corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2. Absolute error (AE) of mean TH values and mean absolute error (MAE) of TH values were compared between the CNN-PBR alone model and the CNN-PBR corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2.
Results
AE of mean TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with HFA 24-2/30-2 correction than in the CNN-PBR alone (1.9dB vs. 2.6dB; P = 0.006). MAE of TH values was lower in the CNN-PBR with correction compared to the CNN-PBR alone (4.2dB vs. 5.3 dB; P < 0.001). The inferior temporal quadrant showed lower prediction errors compared with other quadrants.
Conclusions
The performance of a DL model to predict 10-2 VF from macular OCT was improved by the correction with HFA 24-2/30-2.
Translational relevance: This model can reduce the burden of additional HFA 10-2 by making the best use of routinely performed HFA 24-2/30-2 and macular OCT.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
A deep learning model (CNN-PBR) to predict Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 10-2 visual field (VF) from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements showed an absolute error (AE) of mean threshold sensitivity (TH) values of 2.6dB.
A deep learning model (CNN-PBR) to predict Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 10-2 visual field (VF) from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements showed a mean absolute error (MAE) of threshold sensitivity (TH) values of 5.3 dB.
Correction of a deep learning model (CNN-PBR) with Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2/30-2 visual field (VF) improved the prediction performance of HFA 10-2 VF from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements, resulting in a lower absolute error (AE) of mean threshold sensitivity (TH) values (1.9dB vs. 2.6dB; P = 0.006).
Correction of a deep learning model (CNN-PBR) with Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 24-2/30-2 visual field (VF) improved the prediction performance of HFA 10-2 VF from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements, resulting in a lower mean absolute error (MAE) of threshold sensitivity (TH) values (4.2dB vs. 5.3 dB; P < 0.001).
The inferior temporal quadrant showed lower prediction errors compared with other quadrants when predicting Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 10-2 visual field from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements using a deep learning model (CNN-PBR) corrected with HFA 24-2/30-2.
Related Articles5
Longitudinal variability outcomes of frontloaded visual field testing.
Longitudinal StudyEvaluation of visual function and OCT parameters in ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy: a longitudinal study.
Cohort StudyEye structure shapes neuron function in Drosophila motion vision.
Basic ScienceSpecial AAO Report: Recommendations on Screening for Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy (2025 Revision).
ReviewEyecatcher 3.0 - Validating the Use of "Smart Glasses" as a Low-Cost, Portable Method of Assessing Visual Fields.
Clinical TrialIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.