Efficacy and Safety of Polypropylene Scleral Suture Fixation of Intraocular Lens in Pediatric Nontraumatic Ectopia Lentis: A Real-World Study.
Liu Siyuan, Zhang Xinyu, Liu Zhenzhen, Young Charlotte, Lian Zhangkai, Zheng Danying, Jin Guangming
AI Summary
Scleral-sutured IOLs effectively treat pediatric nontraumatic ectopia lentis, but long-term follow-up is crucial due to common complications like suture exposure and IOL dislocation.
Abstract
Purpose
To report the efficacy and safety of scleral-suture fixation of intraocular lens (SFIOL) in children with nontraumatic ectopia lentis (EL) in a real-world setting.
Design
Retrospective case series.
Methods
The retrospective study included 220 eyes of 123 children with nontraumatic EL completing a minimum of 3 years of postoperative follow-up, and was conducted at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). Lens extraction with primary SFIOL was performed in all eyes. The efficacy outcome was postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). The safety outcomes were postoperative complications and the rate of additional surgery. The secondary outcomes were change in refraction and IOL centration.
Results
The mean age at surgery of the cohort was 7.62 ± 3.41 years, and the median follow-up duration was 4.04 (interquartile range [IQR] = 3.41-5.17) years. In all, 87.2% eyes had CDVA greater than or equal to 0.5 at final follow-up. The postoperative complications included suture exposure in 19 eyes (8.6%), IOL dislocation in 17 eyes (7.7%), IOL pupillary capture in 7 eyes (3.2%), persistent high intraocular pressure in 4 eyes (1.8%), retinal detachment in 3 eyes (1.3%), and endophthalmitis in 2 eyes (0.9%). The additional surgery rate was 7.7%, including retinal detachment in 3 eyes and IOL dislocation in 14 eyes. The postoperative refraction showed a tendency toward myopia. The mean IOL tilt and decentration were 8.6 ± 5.7° and 0.75 ± 0.38 mm, respectively.
Conclusions
SFIOL is an effective method for managing children with nontraumatic EL, but with a certain incidence of complications. Suture exposure and IOL dislocation are the most common complications and may occur over time. Strengthening the postoperative long-term follow-up is crucial for children with nontraumatic EL.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
Scleral-suture fixation of intraocular lens (SFIOL) is an effective method for managing children with nontraumatic ectopia lentis (EL), with 87.2% of eyes achieving a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) greater than or equal to 0.5 at final follow-up.
Scleral-suture fixation of intraocular lens (SFIOL) in children with nontraumatic ectopia lentis (EL) is associated with a certain incidence of complications, with suture exposure occurring in 19 eyes (8.6%) and IOL dislocation in 17 eyes (7.7%).
The additional surgery rate after scleral-suture fixation of intraocular lens (SFIOL) in children with nontraumatic ectopia lentis (EL) was 7.7%, including retinal detachment in 3 eyes and IOL dislocation in 14 eyes.
The mean intraocular lens (IOL) tilt and decentration after scleral-suture fixation of intraocular lens (SFIOL) in children with nontraumatic ectopia lentis (EL) were 8.6 ± 5.7° and 0.75 ± 0.38 mm, respectively.
The mean age at surgery for scleral-suture fixation of intraocular lens (SFIOL) in children with nontraumatic ectopia lentis (EL) was 7.62 ± 3.41 years, and the median follow-up duration was 4.04 years (interquartile range = 3.41-5.17 years).
Related Articles5
Capsular bag distention syndrome after combined cataract-lens implant surgery and Ahmed valve implantation.
Case ReportComplications and Management of Cosmetic Iris Implants.
Case SeriesClinical outcomes and complications following intraocular lens exchange in the setting of an open or intact posterior capsule.
Observational StudyLong-term surgical outcomes of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in pediatric eyes with primary congenital glaucoma versus aphakic glaucoma.
Case SeriesGlaucoma Considerations in Pediatric Cataract Surgery.
Retrospective StudiesIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.