Ophthalmology
OphthalmologyMay 2015Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Threat to fixation at diagnosis and lifetime risk of visual impairment in open-angle glaucoma.

Visual FieldEpidemiology & Genetics

Summary

Including TTF in the assessment of risk for glaucoma blindness did not add any important information when the stage of VFL was taken into account.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether threat to fixation (TTF) at diagnosis increases the risk of central vision loss and glaucoma blindness.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 309 patients (309 eyes) with glaucoma were followed up until death; 203 patients (65.7%) had primary open-angle glaucoma, and 106 patients (34.2%) had exfoliation glaucoma.

METHODS

Study eyes were divided into 2 groups according to TTF in the first glaucomatous visual field: (1) eyes with TTF, defined as visual field loss (VFL) including ≥1 of the 4 innermost points depressed at P -6.00 decibels (dB) versus 95.7% with MD <-20.00 dB. Univariate analysis demonstrated that eyes with TTF at presentation compared with eyes without TTF became blind more often (56/182 [30.8%] vs. 22/127 [17.3%]; P = 0.008) and faster (mean time from diagnosis to blindness, 84.6±50.7 vs. 126.7±51.4 months; P < 0.002). However, in multivariate analysis, TTF was not an independent risk factor for VA <0.3 (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-2.74) or blindness (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-2.01). With regard to patient survival time, there were no differences between eyes with TTF and eyes without TTF after adjusting for disparities in disease severity at presentation (P = 0.934).

CONCLUSIONS

Including TTF in the assessment of risk for glaucoma blindness did not add any important information when the stage of VFL was taken into account.

Discussion

Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.