Prevalence, Features, and Severity of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Measured With the 10-2 Achromatic Threshold Visual Field Test.
Summary
Although central VF loss appears to be common in glaucoma and may have an important role in glaucoma management, additional study is warranted to more definitively determine the optimal methods to detect presence, severity, and…
Abstract
PURPOSE
To investigate the clinical characteristics of 10-2 visual field defects in subjects with a diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma suspicion.
DESIGN
Prospective, observational cohort study.
METHODS
From participants enrolled in an ongoing glaucoma research study at our institution, we identified 354 eyes in 180 subjects (97 with primary open-angle glaucoma, 83 with glaucoma suspicion) who had 2 or more reliable 24-2 and 10-2 visual field tests and good-quality spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) scans. Eyes with macular pathology, significant cataract, or nonglaucomatous vision loss were excluded. We applied previously published cluster criteria to define 10-2 visual field loss, and then calculated prevalence, location, severity, and pattern of 10-2 visual field loss as well as its relationships with various functional and structural parameters.
RESULTS
Repeatable 10-2 visual field defects were present in 89 of 180 subjects (49%) and usually exhibited an arcuate or nasal pattern. In eyes with no, mild, moderate, and advanced 24-2 visual field loss, 15 of 236 (6%), 49 of 67 (73%), 25 of 26 (96%), and 25 of 25 (100%) had 10-2 visual field defects, respectively. Of the 114 eyes with 10-2 visual field loss, 93 (82%) demonstrated abnormal points within the central 10 degrees of the 24-2 visual field test. Mean defect on the 10-2 and 24-2 tests was highly correlated (r(2) = 0.72).
CONCLUSIONS
Although central VF loss appears to be common in glaucoma and may have an important role in glaucoma management, additional study is warranted to more definitively determine the optimal methods to detect presence, severity, and functional impact of central glaucomatous visual field loss.
More by Michael Sullivan-Mee
View full profile →Glaucoma Suspects: The Impact of Risk Factor-Driven Review Periods on Clinical Load, Diagnoses, and Healthcare Costs.
Baseline 10-2 Visual Field Loss as a Predictor for Future Glaucoma Progression.
Prediction of 10-2 Visual Field Loss Using Optical Coherence Tomography and 24-2 Visual Field Data.
Top Research in Visual Field
Browse all →Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.