Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Micropulse Versus Continuous-Wave Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in the Management of Refractory Glaucoma: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Yang Shanshan, Liu Xiangyun, Xie Jiubing, Zhao Chunmei
AI Summary
This study found micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) offers comparable IOP reduction to continuous-wave (CW-TSCPC) for refractory glaucoma, but with significantly less pain and inflammation, making it a potentially safer initial treatment.
Abstract
Prcis: Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) has gained considerable acceptance as a preferred cyclodestructive intervention for refractory glaucoma, offering significantly enhanced safety profiles through precisely controlled pulse energy delivery while maintaining equivalent therapeutic outcomes compared with traditional modalities.
Objective
To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of MP-TSCPC versus continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCPC) in patients with refractory glaucoma.
Materials and methods
This prospective, randomized, single-blind study included 52 patients (52 eyes) with refractory glaucoma assigned to either MP-TSCPC or CW-TSCPC. Patients were followed for 18 months. Secondary outcomes included absolute IOP values, medication reduction, preservation of visual acuity, visual function parameters, quality of life, and complication rates. Success was defined as IOP between 6-21 mm Hg without medications (complete success), with medications (qualified success), or either (cumulative success). Patients were followed for 18 months.
Results
At 18 months, 47 eyes completed follow-up (24 in MP-TSCPC and 23 in CW-TSCPC). The MP-TSCPC group (n=24) achieved a 34.43% IOP reduction from baseline, compared with 42.86% in the CW-TSCPC group (n=23), P=0.052. Complete success rates were 25.00% (6/24) for MP-TSCPC and 21.74% (5/23) for CW-TSCPC (P=0.999), while qualified success rates were 29.16% (7/24) and 39.13% (9/23), respectively (P=0.550). The cumulative success rates were 54.17% for MP-TSCPC and 60.87% for CW-TSCPC (P=0.706). The CW-TSCPC group experienced significantly higher rates of postoperative pain (56.52% vs. 20.83%, P=0.012) and prolonged inflammation (34.78% vs. 8.33%, P=0.039). Visual function parameters remained stable in both groups throughout the study period. Quality of life improved significantly in the MP-TSCPC group but not in the CW-TSCPC group, although between-group differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion
MP-TSCPC demonstrated comparable efficacy to CW-TSCPC in IOP reduction and success rates for refractory glaucoma management, while offering a significantly improved safety profile with less postoperative pain and inflammation. These findings suggest that MP-TSCPC may be considered as a preferred initial cyclodestructive option when balancing efficacy and safety, though larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
MeSH Terms
Key Concepts6
Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) demonstrated comparable efficacy to continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCPC) in IOP reduction (34.43% vs. 42.86%, P=0.052) and success rates for refractory glaucoma management.
The continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCPC) group experienced significantly higher rates of postoperative pain (56.52% vs. 20.83%, P=0.012) and prolonged inflammation (34.78% vs. 8.33%, P=0.039) compared to the Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) group in patients with refractory glaucoma.
Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) may be considered as a preferred initial cyclodestructive option when balancing efficacy and safety for refractory glaucoma management.
The complete success rates at 18 months for refractory glaucoma were 25.00% (6/24) for Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) and 21.74% (5/23) for continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCPC) (P=0.999).
Quality of life improved significantly in the Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) group but not in the continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCPC) group, though between-group differences were not statistically significant, for patients with refractory glaucoma.
This prospective, randomized, single-blind study included 52 patients (52 eyes) with refractory glaucoma assigned to either Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) or continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCPC) and followed for 18 months.
Related Articles5
Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Direct Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: GLAUrious Study.
Randomized Controlled TrialAssociation Between Prior Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty and Phaco-iStent Inject Efficacy.
Observational StudyMicropulse Transscleral Laser Treatment Versus Continuous Wave Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for the Treatment of Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.
Meta-AnalysisSelective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) outcomes following topical therapy.
Retrospective Study180- Versus 360-Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Systematic ReviewIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.