Striving Toward Better Eye Health Beyond Our Waiting Rooms: The LXXX Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.
Summary
The characterization of study populations in the ophthalmic literature is limited by underreporting of patient-centered outcomes, useful for reaffirming the value of eye and vision health in population health.
Abstract
PURPOSE
Visual impairment (VI) negatively impacts the quality of lives of individuals and the optimal health of populations, creating both human and financial costs. Yet, VI has not risen to a level that is considered a priority in population health. This analysis assesses the evidence currently available for strengthening the value proposition for eye health, particularly the demographic characteristics and patient-centered outcomes found in clinical research.
DESIGN
Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.
METHOD
Two searches of the AJO database were performed using relevant key words: Search 1 (S1): NEI-sponsored clinical trials (1970-2023); and Search 2 (S2): Quality of life (2018-2023). The Scopus Cite Score was used as a filter for each search, specifically ≥50 for S1 and ≥20 for S2.
RESULTS
Of the initial 466 articles found, 100 met the preestablished criteria. Age, sex, and race/ancestry/ethnicity were reported across glaucoma, retina, uveitis, cornea, and pediatrics subspecialties in 56% ± 9.7% of the articles; 37% ± 9.5% listed either age only or age, sex, or gender. The characterizations varied and subcategories were rarely reported. Only 2% of S1 and 25% of S2 noted patient-centered outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
The characterization of study populations in the ophthalmic literature is limited by underreporting of patient-centered outcomes, useful for reaffirming the value of eye and vision health in population health. This analysis highlights the need for paying greater attention to more specific demographic categories and focusing more on patient-centered outcomes in clinical research.
More by Eve J Higginbotham
View full profile →Assessment of Cumulative Incidence and Severity of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Among Participants in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study After 20 Years of Follow-up.
Is Newer Necessarily Better? The Evolution of Incisional Glaucoma Surgery Over the Last 100 Years.
Assessment of the Impact of an Endpoint Committee in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.
Top Research in Quality of Life
Browse all →Neuroprotective strategies for retinal disease.
Detection and measurement of clinically meaningful visual field progression in clinical trials for glaucoma.
The Association Between Glaucoma, Anxiety, and Depression in a Large Population.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.