Glaucoma Classification Through SSVEP-Derived ON- and OFF-Pathway Features.
Martin T W Scott, Hui Xu, Alexandra Yakovleva, Robert Tibshirani, Jeffrey L Goldberg, Anthony M Norcia
Summary
Our findings highlight the informational value of signal phase, a metric often omitted in applications of the SSVEP to glaucoma and other optic neuropathies.
Abstract
PURPOSE
This work aims to evaluate the relative contribution of the amplitude and phase of both ON- and OFF-pathway biased steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) to the classification of patients with glaucoma from healthy controls.
METHODS
SSVEPs were recorded for sawtooth luminance increments (ON-biasing) and decrements (OFF-biasing), modulating at a temporal frequency of 2.73 Hz. SSVEP data from 98 adults with glaucoma and 71 controls were used to train a set of logistic regressions. Data were partitioned prior to training to investigate the relative contribution to classification for amplitude and phase features derived from ON- versus OFF-pathway stimulation.
RESULTS
We report moderate overall classification accuracy (area under the curve ∼0.7). Classification based solely on signal phase features significantly outperformed classification based solely on signal amplitude features. Classification using OFF-pathway biasing features produced a statistically significant improvement in classification only when training on signal amplitude features. This OFF advantage was not conserved in a dataset with low signal-to-noise eyes removed.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings highlight the informational value of signal phase, a metric often omitted in applications of the SSVEP to glaucoma and other optic neuropathies. Additionally, our results suggest that OFF-pathway amplitude features may be less vulnerable to the limitations imposed by a low signal-to-noise ratio. However, they are not indicative of a gross difference in glaucoma classification performance between ON- and OFF-pathway biased features.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE
Electrophysiological estimates of visual signal delay should be considered in future clinical diagnostic tools as they make a material contribution to the classification of glaucomatous eyes.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.