Volumetric Analysis of Perimetry Tests to Guide Central Testing: The Functional Vulnerability Zone.
Jack Phu, Henrietta Wang, Michael Kalloniatis
AI Summary
This study analyzed visual field data, finding the 24-2 test often misses residual central sensitivity better captured by the 10-2 test (Functional Vulnerability Zone). This helps clinicians decide when to use the 10-2 test.
Abstract
Purpose
To use volumetric analysis applied to total deviation (TD) perimetric data to characterize the presence of residual sensitivity measurable using the 10-2 in lieu of the 24-2 test grid in glaucoma (the functional vulnerability zone [FVZ]) and develop a prototype end-user application for clinical guidance.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Subjects
Six hundred twenty-six pairs of Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA)-Fast and 24-2 SITA-Faster test results of 160 subjects.
Methods
Total deviation values located within 10° from fixation (10-2, 68 locations; 24-2, 12 locations) were extracted. Volumetric analysis was performed to calculate the difference in TD "volume" (10-2 - 24-2) for each pair of results. Then, 24-2 test locations were interpolated across the central 10° to obtain "equivalent" 10-2 test locations used to calculate number of test locations gained (10-2 - 24-2). A positive TD volume difference and positive gain represented the presence of an FVZ. Linear regression and principal components analysis were used to identify 24-2 test features that may predict the presence of an FVZ.
Main outcome measures
Volumetric differences in visual field TD as a surrogate for a FVZ.
Results
Visual field global indices and the number of central 24-2 defects predicted TD volume difference ( P < 0.0001), with 24-2 mean deviation (MD) showing the highest R 2 (0.32). All parameters had low R 2 values when predicting gain. A simplified model comprising 24-2 MD and number of central 24-2 TD probability (TDP) defects ( P < 0.01) provided a method for clinically identifying the likelihood of an FVZ. Principal components analysis revealed 2 principal components (24-2 global indices and pointwise probability scores) that accounted for 79.7% of the variance, with principal component 1 accounting for 69.3% and comprising 24-2 MD and number of central 24-2 TDP scores at P < 2%.
Conclusions
The FVZ offers a data-driven approach to identifying residual dynamic range using the 10-2 test grid. A prototype model for predicting the likelihood of 10-2 utility in progression analysis is proposed.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Related Articles5
Longitudinal variability outcomes of frontloaded visual field testing.
Longitudinal StudyVisual Field Progression Rates in Glaucoma: Frontloaded Versus Clinical Standard (Nonfrontloaded) SITA-Faster.
Observational StudyEndpoints and Design for Clinical Trials in USH2A-Related Retinal Degeneration: Results and Recommendations From the RUSH2A Natural History Study.
Clinical TrialRate of Progression Among Different Age Groups in Glaucoma With High Myopia: A 10-Year Follow-Up Cohort Study.
Cohort StudyEyecatcher 3.0 - Validating the Use of "Smart Glasses" as a Low-Cost, Portable Method of Assessing Visual Fields.
Clinical TrialIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.