Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Eye (Lond)April 20260 citations

Multicentre study comparing ab-interno canaloplasty and trabecular micro-bypass stent in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Kerr Nathan, Ratnarajan Gokulan, Wang Jing, Ng Weng, Cheng Jason, Spaulding Justin, Vermorgen Koen, Shoham-Hazon Nir, Patel Shamil, Lubeck David


AI Summary

This study compared canaloplasty and trabecular micro-bypass stents for glaucoma, finding similar IOP and medication reduction, but canaloplasty led to more medication-free eyes. Both procedures were safe.

Abstract

Purpose

To compare canaloplasty and trabecular micro-bypass surgery outcomes in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods

Ambispective study using data from the International Glaucoma Surgery Registry (IGSR) to evaluate mild-to-moderate POAG patients who underwent iTrack ab-interno canaloplasty (Nova Eye Medical, USA) (prospective cohort) or iStent trabecular micro-bypass implantation (Glaukos, USA) (retrospective cohort), with or without concomitant phacoemulsification, and ≥12 months of follow-up. Primary outcomes were intraocular pressure (IOP), medication usage, and surgical success as defined by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (2024).

Results

The study included 339 eyes (iStent: n = 115; iTrack: n = 224) of which ≥94% underwent concomitant phacoemulsification (iStent: n = 109, iTrack: n = 210). There were nonsignificant differences in baseline IOP (p = 0.417) and medications (p = 0.741) between groups. At last follow-up, mean IOP (mmHg) and medication usage decreased from 17.3 ± 4.2 and 2.0 ± 1.1 at baseline to 14.2 ± 3.5 and 1.3 ± 1.1 in the iStent group (p < 0.001; mean follow-up: 27.2 ± 14.5 months), and from 16.9 ± 5.0 and 2.0 ± 1.1 at baseline to 14.3 ± 3.4 and 1.1 ± 1.3 in the iTrack group (p < 0.001; mean follow-up: 20.3 ± 7.7 months). Both groups showed no significant differences in reduction of IOP (p = 0.422) and medications (p = 0.211). More eyes were medication-free in the iTrack group (42% vs 29%; p = 0.029). Success was achieved in 61% of eyes in both groups (p = 1.000). Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated infrequent and self-limited complications, no sight-threatening events, and low reoperation rates.

Conclusion

In POAG, iTrack canaloplasty and iStent implantation showed no statistically significant differences in effectiveness outcomes. Both procedures had favourable safety profiles with limited additional glaucoma surgeries. More canaloplasty eyes were medication-free compared to stent eyes.


Key Concepts6

In primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, iTrack ab-interno canaloplasty and iStent trabecular micro-bypass implantation showed no statistically significant differences in effectiveness outcomes.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortAmbispective cohort studyn=339 eyes (iStent: n=115; iTrack: n=224)Ch11Ch45

In primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, both iTrack ab-interno canaloplasty and iStent trabecular micro-bypass implantation had favourable safety profiles with infrequent and self-limited complications, no sight-threatening events, and low reoperation rates.

TreatmentCohortAmbispective cohort studyn=339 eyes (iStent: n=115; iTrack: n=224)Ch11Ch45

More eyes were medication-free in the iTrack ab-interno canaloplasty group (42%) compared to the iStent trabecular micro-bypass implantation group (29%) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients (p=0.029).

Comparative EffectivenessCohortAmbispective cohort studyn=339 eyes (iStent: n=115; iTrack: n=224)Ch11Ch45

In primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication usage decreased from 17.3 ± 4.2 mmHg and 2.0 ± 1.1 at baseline to 14.2 ± 3.5 mmHg and 1.3 ± 1.1 in the iStent trabecular micro-bypass group (p<0.001) over a mean follow-up of 27.2 ± 14.5 months.

TreatmentCohortAmbispective cohort studyn=115 eyesCh11Ch45

In primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication usage decreased from 16.9 ± 5.0 mmHg and 2.0 ± 1.1 at baseline to 14.3 ± 3.4 mmHg and 1.1 ± 1.3 in the iTrack ab-interno canaloplasty group (p<0.001) over a mean follow-up of 20.3 ± 7.7 months.

TreatmentCohortAmbispective cohort studyn=224 eyesCh11Ch45

This ambispective study used data from the International Glaucoma Surgery Registry (IGSR) to evaluate mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients who underwent iTrack ab-interno canaloplasty (prospective cohort) or iStent trabecular micro-bypass implantation (retrospective cohort), with or without concomitant phacoemulsification, and ≥12 months of follow-up.

MethodologyCohortAmbispective cohort studyn=339 eyes (iStent: n=115; iTrack: n=224)Ch9

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.