Diagnosis of High Intracranial Pressure by Non-Optic Nerve Retinal Image Features.
Abdolahi Farzan, Li Kelvin Z, Zou Yuhang, Moss Heather E, Shahidi Mahnaz
AI Summary
AI and neuro-ophthalmologists accurately diagnose elevated ICP from retinal images, even without the optic nerve head. This highlights non-ONH retinal features' diagnostic potential for ICP, aiding diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment assessment.
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the performance of an artificial intelligence deep learning (DL) model compared with neuro-ophthalmologists for the classification of subjects with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and papilledema versus control subjects, based on retinal images with and without masking the optic nerve heads (ONHs).
Methods
Widefield retinal images were obtained in 32 subjects (70 images) with elevated ICP and papilledema and 31 control subjects (62 images). ONH-unmasked images were generated by cropping the image to a 30° circular region. ONH-masked images were generated by masking the ONH and peripapillary region. Classification was performed using a convolutional neural network model and by two neuro-ophthalmologists (graders).
Results
For the ONH-unmasked images, the classification accuracies of the model, grader 1, and grader 2 were 83% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.94), 93%, and 86%, respectively. For the ONH-masked images, the classification accuracies of the model, grader 1, and grader 2 were 79% (AUC = 0.90), 66%, and 76%, respectively. The classification performance of the DL model and graders did not significantly differ for both datasets (P ≥ 0.38). There was no significant effect of ONH masking on the performance of the DL model (P = 1.0) and grader 2 (P = 0.38), whereas the performance of grader 1 was significantly reduced (P = 0.02).
Conclusions
Both expert graders and the DL models demonstrated excellent performance for classifying retinal images of subjects with elevated and normal ICP using images with or without masking the ONH.
Translational relevance: Methods for assessment of non-optic nerve retinal image features have the potential to improve diagnosis and monitoring the progression and response to treatment of elevated ICP.
MeSH Terms
Key Concepts6
For ONH-unmasked retinal images, the classification accuracies for subjects with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and papilledema versus control subjects were 83% for the artificial intelligence deep learning (DL) model, 93% for grader 1 (neuro-ophthalmologist), and 86% for grader 2 (neuro-ophthalmologist).
For ONH-masked retinal images, the classification accuracies for subjects with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and papilledema versus control subjects were 79% (AUC = 0.90) for the artificial intelligence deep learning (DL) model, 66% for grader 1 (neuro-ophthalmologist), and 76% for grader 2 (neuro-ophthalmologist).
The classification performance of the artificial intelligence deep learning (DL) model and neuro-ophthalmologist graders did not significantly differ for both ONH-unmasked and ONH-masked retinal image datasets (P ≥ 0.38) in classifying subjects with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and papilledema versus control subjects.
There was no significant effect of optic nerve head (ONH) masking on the performance of the artificial intelligence deep learning (DL) model (P = 1.0) and grader 2 (neuro-ophthalmologist) (P = 0.38) in classifying subjects with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and papilledema versus control subjects.
The performance of grader 1 (neuro-ophthalmologist) was significantly reduced (P = 0.02) by optic nerve head (ONH) masking when classifying subjects with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and papilledema versus control subjects.
Both expert neuro-ophthalmologist graders and artificial intelligence deep learning (DL) models demonstrated excellent performance for classifying retinal images of subjects with elevated and normal intracranial pressure (ICP) using images with or without masking the optic nerve head (ONH).
Related Articles5
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2024 revisions of the McDonald criteria.
Review2024 MAGNIMS-CMSC-NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
ReviewThe use of optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in the 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis.
ReviewEvaluation of visual function and OCT parameters in ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy: a longitudinal study.
Cohort StudyOptic Nerve Atrophy Conditions Associated With 3D Unsegmented Optical Coherence Tomography Volumes Using Deep Learning.
Cross-Sectional StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.