Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaOctober 201625 citations

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty for Open-angle Glaucoma Receiving Maximal-tolerable Medical Therapy.

Miki Atsuya, Kawashima Rumi, Usui Shinichi, Matsushita Kenji, Nishida Kohji


AI Summary

SLT for open-angle glaucoma on maximal medical therapy showed limited 1-year IOP control. Success varied by glaucoma type and baseline IOP, suggesting SLT may be less effective in these advanced cases.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) for patients with open-angle glaucoma receiving maximal-tolerable medical therapy.

Patients and methods: Consecutive patients with open-angle glaucoma who were followed up for at least 1 year after SLT were retrospectively evaluated. The effectiveness was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with 2 criteria for failure: (1) intraocular pressure (IOP) equal to or more than baseline; and (2) <20% reduction from baseline, on 2 consecutive visits. Those 2 failure criteria also included loss of light perception, reoperation of SLT, and glaucoma surgery. Influence of baseline factors on success were assessed using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Seventy-five eyes [39 primary open-angle glaucoma, 23 exfoliation glaucoma, and 13 secondary open-angle glaucoma (SOAG)] of 59 patients (21 females) aged 65.5±15.9 (mean±SD) were included. Preoperative mean IOP was 23.3±6.5 mm Hg with 3.4±1.3 IOP lowering medications. The overall success ratio at the end of study period was 45.3% by criterion 1 and 14.2% by criterion 2. The success ratio by criterion 1 and 2 was 61.1% and 21.7% in primary open-angle glaucoma, 29.3% and 14.5% in exfoliation glaucoma, and 15.4% and 7.7% in SOAG, respectively. Higher preoperative IOP and diagnosis of SOAG were significantly associated with treatment failure (P<0.01 and 0.04, respectively).

Conclusions

One-year efficacy of SLT in controlling IOP was very limited in patients with maximal-tolerable medical therapy. Types of glaucoma and preoperative IOP were significant prognostic factors for treatment success.


MeSH Terms

AgedAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureLaser TherapyLasers, Solid-StateMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTonometry, OcularTrabeculectomyTreatment Outcome

Key Concepts5

The overall success ratio of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) for open-angle glaucoma receiving maximal-tolerable medical therapy was 45.3% by criterion 1 (IOP equal to or more than baseline) and 14.2% by criterion 2 (<20% reduction from baseline, on 2 consecutive visits) at the end of the study period.

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=75 eyes of 59 patientsCh28Ch37

For patients with primary open-angle glaucoma receiving maximal-tolerable medical therapy, the success ratio of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) was 61.1% by criterion 1 and 21.7% by criterion 2.

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=39 eyes with primary open-angle glaucomaCh11Ch37

For patients with exfoliation glaucoma receiving maximal-tolerable medical therapy, the success ratio of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) was 29.3% by criterion 1 and 14.5% by criterion 2.

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=23 eyes with exfoliation glaucomaCh15Ch37

For patients with secondary open-angle glaucoma (SOAG) receiving maximal-tolerable medical therapy, the success ratio of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) was 15.4% by criterion 1 and 7.7% by criterion 2.

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=13 eyes with secondary open-angle gla…Ch7Ch37

Higher preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and a diagnosis of secondary open-angle glaucoma (SOAG) were significantly associated with selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) treatment failure (P<0.01 and P=0.04, respectively) in patients with open-angle glaucoma receiving maximal-tolerable medical therapy.

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=75 eyes of 59 patientsCh28Ch37

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.