Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciMarch 201611 citations

The Relationship of the Clinical Disc Margin and Bruch's Membrane Opening in Normal and Glaucoma Subjects.

Amini Navid, Miraftabi Arezoo, Henry Sharon, Chung Norman, Nowroozizadeh Sarah, Caprioli Joseph, Nouri-Mahdavi Kouros


AI Summary

This study found the clinical disc area was larger than Bruch's membrane opening in both normal and glaucoma eyes, but this mismatch wasn't affected by glaucoma, impacting optic nerve head evaluation.

Abstract

Purpose

We tested the hypotheses that the mismatch between the clinical disc margin (CDM) and Bruch's membrane opening (BMO) is a function of BMO area (BMOA) and is affected by the presence of glaucoma.

Methods

A total of 45 normal eyes (45 subjects) and 53 glaucomatous eyes (53 patients) were enrolled and underwent radial optic nerve head (ONH) imaging with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. The inner tip of the Bruch's membrane (BM) and the clinical disc margin were marked on radial scans and optic disc photographs, and were coregistered with custom software. The main outcome measure was the difference between the clinical disc area (CDA) and BMOA, or CDA-BMOA mismatch, as a function of BMOA and diagnosis. Multivariate regression analyses were used to explore the influence of glaucoma and BMOA on the mismatch.

Results

Global CDA was larger than BMOA in both groups but the difference was statistically significant only in the normal group (1.98 ± 0.37 vs. 1.85 ± 0.45 mm2, P = 0.02 in the normal group; 1.96 ± 0.38 vs. 1.89 ± 0.56 mm2, P = 0.08 in the glaucoma group). The sectoral CDA-BMOA mismatch was smaller in superotemporal (P = 0.04) and superonasal (P = 0.05) sectors in the glaucoma group. The normalized CDA-BMOA difference decreased with increasing BMOA in both groups (P < 0.001). Presence or severity of glaucoma did not affect the CDA-BMOA difference (P > 0.14).

Conclusions

Clinical disc area was larger than BMOA in normal and glaucoma eyes but reached statistical significance only in the former group. The CDA-BMOA mismatch diminished with increasing BMOA but was not affected by presence of glaucoma. These findings have important clinical implications regarding clinical evaluation of the ONH.


MeSH Terms

AgedBruch MembraneFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedOptic DiskProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical Coherence

Key Concepts5

The global clinical disc area (CDA) was larger than Bruch's membrane opening area (BMOA) in 45 normal eyes (45 subjects), with a statistically significant difference (1.98 ± 0.37 mm2 vs. 1.85 ± 0.45 mm2, P = 0.02).

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=45 normal eyes (45 subjects)Ch5Ch12

The global clinical disc area (CDA) was larger than Bruch's membrane opening area (BMOA) in 53 glaucomatous eyes (53 patients), but the difference was not statistically significant (1.96 ± 0.38 mm2 vs. 1.89 ± 0.56 mm2, P = 0.08).

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=53 glaucomatous eyes (53 patients)Ch5Ch12

The sectoral clinical disc area (CDA) - Bruch's membrane opening area (BMOA) mismatch was smaller in the superotemporal (P = 0.04) and superonasal (P = 0.05) sectors in the glaucoma group compared to the normal group.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=45 normal eyes (45 subjects) and 53 g…Ch5Ch12

The normalized clinical disc area (CDA) - Bruch's membrane opening area (BMOA) difference decreased with increasing BMOA in both 45 normal eyes and 53 glaucomatous eyes (P < 0.001).

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=45 normal eyes (45 subjects) and 53 g…Ch5Ch12

The presence or severity of glaucoma did not affect the clinical disc area (CDA) - Bruch's membrane opening area (BMOA) difference (P > 0.14) in a study of 45 normal eyes and 53 glaucomatous eyes.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=45 normal eyes (45 subjects) and 53 g…Ch5Ch12

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.