Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Acta OphthalmolJuly 201921 citations

Retinal vessel phenotype in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Chiquet Christophe, Gavard Olivier, Arnould Louis, Mautuit Thibaud, Macgillivray Tom J, Bron Alain M, Semecas Rachel, Trucco Emmanuele, Florent Aptel


AI Summary

POAG patients exhibit narrower retinal arteries and veins and altered vascular fractal dimensions, suggesting these retinal vessel changes may be associated with glaucoma pathophysiology.

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize the phenotype of retinal vessels using central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE), central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE), tortuosity and fractal dimension (FD) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects.

Methods

This prospective case-control multicentre study included 61 POAG subjects and 61 controls matched for age, systemic hypertension and body mass index. Fundus images of the right eye were acquired using a non-mydriatic camera. Central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE), CRVE, arteriole-to-venule ratio, FD and tortuosity of the vascular network were measured using VAMPIRE software (Vessel Assessment and Measurement Platform for Images of the Retina). Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients underwent 24.2 sita-standard visual field and peri-papillary optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations. Data were expressed as median and interquartile range (75-25th percentiles).

Results

The control group was comparable to the POAG group for sex ratio, refraction and intraocular pressure. The mean CRAE and the mean CRVE were significantly lower in the POAG group than in the control group [150.5 (137.9; 157.1) μm versus 161.3 (154.0; 168.4) μm and 204.8 (190.1; 218.1) μm versus 233.5 (222.3; 246.9) μm, respectively; p < 0.001] and for fractal parameters as well. No significant difference was found for tortuosity between the two groups. There was a significant correlation between CRAE and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness (r = 0.27; p = 0.03). VAMPIRE parameters were not correlated with visual field indices.

Conclusion

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was associated with a narrowing of arterial and venous retinal vessels, a higher arteriole-to-venule ratio and lower values of FD. The relationship between CRAE and RNFL thickness needs further investigation.


MeSH Terms

Case-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedOptic DiskPhenotypeProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Fields

Key Concepts4

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was associated with a narrowing of arterial and venous retinal vessels, a higher arteriole-to-venule ratio, and lower values of fractal dimension (FD) in a prospective case-control multicentre study of 61 POAG subjects and 61 controls.

DiagnosisCohortProspective Case-Control Studyn=61 POAG subjects and 61 controlsCh5Ch12

The mean central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) was significantly lower in the primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) group [150.5 (137.9; 157.1) μm] than in the control group [161.3 (154.0; 168.4) μm] (p < 0.001) in a prospective case-control multicentre study of 61 POAG subjects and 61 controls.

DiagnosisCohortProspective Case-Control Studyn=61 POAG subjects and 61 controlsCh5Ch12

The mean central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) was significantly lower in the primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) group [204.8 (190.1; 218.1) μm] than in the control group [233.5 (222.3; 246.9) μm] (p < 0.001) in a prospective case-control multicentre study of 61 POAG subjects and 61 controls.

DiagnosisCohortProspective Case-Control Studyn=61 POAG subjects and 61 controlsCh5Ch12

There was a significant correlation between central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness (r = 0.27; p = 0.03) in a prospective case-control multicentre study of 61 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects and 61 controls.

PrognosisCohortProspective Case-Control Studyn=61 POAG subjects and 61 controlsCh5Ch12

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.