Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciMarch 20190 citations

Regional Variations and Intra-/Intersession Repeatability for Scotopic Sensitivity in Normal Controls and Patients With Inherited Retinal Degenerations.

Bennett Lea D, Metz Georgiana, Klein Martin, Locke Kirsten G, Khwaja Areeba, Birch David G


AI Summary

This study found age and retinal region affect scotopic sensitivity, with specific repeatability for DAC perimetry in IRD and controls, crucial for monitoring disease progression.

Abstract

Purpose

Dark-adapted visual fields were obtained from patients with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) and controls to evaluate the effect that age, retinal region, and disease had on scotopic sensitivity. Intra- and intersession test-retest repeatabilities for patients and controls were measured to establish significant change for longitudinal studies.

Methods

A total of 41 patients with IRD and 30 controls had one eye dilated and dark-adapted for 40 minutes. Scotopic sensitivity was measured with a Medmont dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimeter (size V stimulus, 200-ms duration, background luminance < 0.0001 cd/m2, dynamic range 0-75 decibel [dB]). Mixed effects analysis was performed to analyze age, retinal eccentricity, and sensitivity. The intra-/intersession coefficients of repeatability (CR) were calculated for controls and patients with IRD.

Results

Each additional year was associated with lower sensitivity (-0.22 dB) per year in normal controls over age 50 compared to younger controls (12-49 years). The superior field had lower sensitivity than the inferior, but the nasal field was not different compared to the temporal field in normal controls. The CR for intra- and intersession testing on mean sensitivity (MS)/pointwise sensitivity (PWS) were ±1.5/±8.5 and ±3.3/±9.8 dB, respectively, for patients with IRD. Control MS/PWS CR were ±1.5/±6.1 dB for intrasession and ±1.7/±6.8 dB for intersession DAC perimetry.

Conclusions

The DAC perimeter is an important asset because it tests a wide field of scotopic vision. The CR are comparable to those of other perimetry devices. Effects of age and retinal region should be considered when assessing scotopic sensitivity measured with the DAC perimeter.


MeSH Terms

AdolescentAdultAgedChildDark AdaptationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedNight VisionObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsRetinaRetinal DegenerationScotomaVisual AcuityVisual Field TestsVisual FieldsYoung Adult

Key Concepts5

In normal controls over age 50, each additional year was associated with lower scotopic sensitivity (-0.22 dB) per year compared to younger controls (12-49 years) when measured with a Medmont dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimeter.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=30 normal controlsCh6Ch10

The superior retinal field had lower scotopic sensitivity than the inferior field in normal controls when measured with a Medmont dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimeter, but the nasal field was not different compared to the temporal field.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=30 normal controlsCh6

The coefficient of repeatability (CR) for intrasession testing on mean sensitivity (MS)/pointwise sensitivity (PWS) using a Medmont dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimeter was ±1.5/±8.5 dB for patients with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) and ±1.5/±6.1 dB for normal controls.

MethodologyCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=41 patients with IRD and 30 controlsCh6

The coefficient of repeatability (CR) for intersession testing on mean sensitivity (MS)/pointwise sensitivity (PWS) using a Medmont dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimeter was ±3.3/±9.8 dB for patients with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) and ±1.7/±6.8 dB for normal controls.

MethodologyCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=41 patients with IRD and 30 controlsCh6

A Medmont dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimeter, which tests a wide field of scotopic vision, has coefficients of repeatability comparable to those of other perimetry devices.

MethodologyCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=41 patients with IRD and 30 controlsCh6

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.