Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Graefes Arch Clin Exp OphthalmolJuly 20203 citations

Remote screening of retinal and optic disc diseases using handheld nonmydriatic cameras in programmed routine occupational health checkups onsite at work centers.

Zapata Miguel A, Martín Ruth, Garcia-Arumí Claudia, Fonollosa Alex, Flores-Moreno Ignacio, Gallego-Pinazo Roberto, Gutiérrez Estanislao, Abraldes Maximino, Zarranz-Ventura Javier


AI Summary

Remote screening using handheld cameras in workplace checkups is feasible, quickly detecting retinal/optic disc abnormalities (e.g., glaucomatous optic disc) in 7.8% of workers, enabling early detection of vision-threatening conditions.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the first year outcomes of a remote screening program for detection of retinal diseases using handheld nonmydriatic cameras in occupational routine checkups performed onsite at work centers.

Methods

Cross-sectional, first year screening program outcomes audit. Participants were volunteers recruited from staff within work centers. Retinal fundus images were captured by technicians, and images and data were anonymized and sent securely to a remote server. A team of ophthalmologists, all retinal specialists, remotely read the images using a custom-made software and sent telematic reports of findings within 24-48 h. The main items evaluated were the detection of retinal abnormalities and the relationship between retinal findings and demographic data such as age and sex.

Results

A total of 19,881 workers were evaluated in 52 centers. Mean age was 41.1 years old, 43.9% men and 56.1% women. Mean duration of the test was around 2 min. Of the workers, 7.8% presented abnormalities in retinal fundus images, being the main findings choroidal nevus (2.4%), macular pigment abnormalities (1.5%), glaucomatous optic disc (1.2%), and macular signs of high myopia (1.1%). The presence of abnormalities was associated with greater age, being 5%, 7.9%, 12.6%, and 19.7% in workers less than 40 years, from 40 to 49, 50-59, and ≥ 60 years (p < 0.05), respectively. Men had more abnormalities in retinal fundus images than women (8.6 vs. 7.2; p < 0.05 RR: 1.2; CI 1092-1322).

Conclusions

Mass screening of retinal and optic disc abnormalities during occupational health routine checkups is a feasible, quick, and efficient tool for early detection of potential vision-threatening disease markers.


MeSH Terms

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningOccupational HealthOptic DiskPhotographyRetinal Diseases

Key Concepts5

In a remote screening program using handheld nonmydriatic cameras in occupational routine checkups, 7.8% of 19,881 workers evaluated in 52 centers presented abnormalities in retinal fundus images.

EpidemiologyCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=19,881 workersCh10

The main findings in a remote screening program using handheld nonmydriatic cameras in occupational routine checkups were choroidal nevus (2.4%), macular pigment abnormalities (1.5%), glaucomatous optic disc (1.2%), and macular signs of high myopia (1.1%) among 19,881 workers.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=19,881 workersCh5Ch10

The presence of retinal abnormalities in a remote screening program using handheld nonmydriatic cameras was associated with greater age, being 5% in workers less than 40 years, 7.9% from 40 to 49, 12.6% from 50-59, and 19.7% in workers ≥ 60 years (p < 0.05) among 19,881 workers.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=19,881 workersCh10

Men had more abnormalities in retinal fundus images than women (8.6% vs. 7.2%; p < 0.05, RR: 1.2; CI 1.092-1.322) in a remote screening program using handheld nonmydriatic cameras among 19,881 workers.

EpidemiologyCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=19,881 workersCh10

Mass screening of retinal and optic disc abnormalities during occupational health routine checkups using handheld nonmydriatic cameras is a feasible, quick, and efficient tool for early detection of potential vision-threatening disease markers.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=19,881 workersCh5Ch10

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.