Temporal Raphe Sign in Elderly Patients With Large Optic Disc Cupping: Its Evaluation as a Predictive Factor for Glaucoma Conversion.
Ha Ahnul, Kim Young Kook, Kim Jin-Soo, Jeoung Jin Wook, Park Ki Ho
AI Summary
In elderly patients with large optic disc cupping, a baseline temporal raphe sign on macular OCT strongly predicted conversion to normal-tension glaucoma, offering a new prognostic indicator.
Abstract
Purpose
To determine baseline clinical features associated with conversion to glaucoma in elderly patients with large optic-disc cupping.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Methods
Seventy-two eyes of 72 untreated elderly (≥65-year-old) patients with large vertical cup-to-disc ratio (CDR ≥0.7) and without any other glaucomatous findings were included. They had undergone a full ophthalmologic examination twice per year for at least 5 years. The optic nerve head (ONH), peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) were imaged with Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (OCT). Presence of temporal raphe sign on the OCT's GCIPL thickness map was assessed as one of the morphologic factors. Conversion to normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) was defined as structural or functional deterioration on either red-free RNFL photography or standard automated perimetry, respectively. The utility of the baseline factors associated with conversion to NTG were identified.
Results
During the 5.5-year follow-up, 19 eyes (26.4%) converted to NTG. There were no significant differences in demographics, systemic factors, intraocular pressure factors, or OCT parameters between the nonconverters and converters. Interestingly, the temporal raphe sign was observed in the converters (18/19, 94.7%) much more frequently than in the nonconverters (3/53, 5.7%, P < .001) at baseline. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated the significant influences of temporal raphe sign positivity (hazard ratio 6.823, 95% confidence interval 2.574, 18.088, P < .001) on conversion to NTG.
Conclusions
In elderly subjects with large CDR, temporal raphe sign positivity on the baseline macular GCIPL thickness map was associated with faster conversion to NTG.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
In a retrospective cohort study of 72 untreated elderly (≥65-year-old) patients with large vertical cup-to-disc ratio (CDR ≥0.7), the temporal raphe sign on the OCT's GCIPL thickness map was observed in 18/19 (94.7%) of converters to normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) compared to 3/53 (5.7%) of nonconverters at baseline (P < .001).
A Cox proportional hazards model in a retrospective cohort study of 72 untreated elderly (≥65-year-old) patients with large vertical cup-to-disc ratio (CDR ≥0.7) indicated that temporal raphe sign positivity had a significant influence on conversion to normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), with a hazard ratio of 6.823 (95% confidence interval 2.574, 18.088, P < .001).
In elderly subjects with large vertical cup-to-disc ratio (CDR ≥0.7), temporal raphe sign positivity on the baseline macular GCIPL thickness map was associated with faster conversion to normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).
In a retrospective cohort study of 72 untreated elderly (≥65-year-old) patients with large vertical cup-to-disc ratio (CDR ≥0.7) and without any other glaucomatous findings, 19 eyes (26.4%) converted to normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) during a 5.5-year follow-up period.
Related Articles5
Longitudinal OCTA vessel density loss in macula and optic nerve head in healthy, glaucoma suspect and established glaucoma eyes.
Cohort StudyDeep-learning-based prediction of glaucoma conversion in normotensive glaucoma suspects.
Cohort StudyStandardization of High Myopia Optic Nerve Head Abnormalities May Help Diagnose Glaucoma in High Myopia.
Observational StudyEarly Detection of Primary Open Angle, Angle Closure, and Normal Tension Glaucoma in an Asian Population Using Optical Coherence Tomography.
Cross-Sectional StudyPeripapillary and Macular Vascular Density in Patients With Preperimetric and Early Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.
Cross-Sectional StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.