Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Am J OphthalmolMarch 2020100 citations

Intermediate Outcomes of a Novel Standalone Ab Externo SIBS Microshunt With Mitomycin C.

Schlenker Matthew B, Durr Georges M, Michaelov Evan, Ahmed Iqbal Ike K


AI Summary

This study found a novel glaucoma microshunt with MMC achieved promising 1-year success rates (77-93%) with few complications, suggesting it's an effective new surgical option.

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the efficacy, risk factors for failure, and adverse events of a standalone novel ab externo SIBS microshunt with mitomycin C (MMC) during 1-year follow-up.

Design

Retrospective, interventional case series.

Subjects

Glaucomatous eyes with an intraocular pressure (IOP) above target and/or progressing on maximally tolerated medical therapy.

Methods

Consecutive patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and no previous filtering surgery received an ab externo SIBS microshunt with MMC from July 2015 to November 2017. Main outcome measures were proportion of eyes at 1-year with (1) no 2 consecutive IOP readings >17 mm Hg or clinical hypotony without (complete) or with glaucoma medications (qualified); and (2) at least a 20% reduction from decision IOP. Secondary outcomes included upper IOP thresholds of 14 mm Hg and 21 mm Hg with and without a 20% IOP reduction from baseline, median IOP, medications, risk factors for failure, interventions, complications, and reoperations.

Results

A total of 164 eyes in 132 patients were included. Complete success was achieved in 76.9% of eyes, qualified success in 92.5%. Complete success was 75.6% for an upper IOP cut-off of 14 mm Hg and 76.9% for 21 mm Hg, and qualified success was 91.9% and 92.5%. MMC dose of 0.2 vs 0.4-0.5 mg/mL (hazard ratio [HR] 2.51; 95% CI 1.12-5.65) and primary open-angle glaucoma vs secondary open-angle glaucoma (SOAG) (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.01-6.23) represented the only risk factors for failure in multivariable analysis. Needling was performed in 8.5% of eyes. Two eyes received surgical revision, and 1 a reoperation.

Conclusions

One-year results of the ab externo SIBS microshunt demonstrated promising rates of qualified and complete success, decreased drop use, few complications, and infrequent postoperative interventions.


MeSH Terms

AgedAlkylating AgentsFemaleGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedMitomycinProsthesis ImplantationRetrospective StudiesTenon CapsuleTonometry, OcularTreatment OutcomeVisual Acuity

Key Concepts5

Complete success was achieved in 76.9% of eyes receiving a standalone ab externo SIBS microshunt with mitomycin C (MMC) during 1-year follow-up, defined as no 2 consecutive IOP readings >17 mm Hg or clinical hypotony without glaucoma medications.

TreatmentCase seriesRetrospective, interventional case seriesn=164 eyes in 132 patientsCh41

Qualified success was achieved in 92.5% of eyes receiving a standalone ab externo SIBS microshunt with mitomycin C (MMC) during 1-year follow-up, defined as no 2 consecutive IOP readings >17 mm Hg or clinical hypotony with glaucoma medications.

TreatmentCase seriesRetrospective, interventional case seriesn=164 eyes in 132 patientsCh41

A mitomycin C (MMC) dose of 0.2 mg/mL (hazard ratio [HR] 2.51; 95% CI 1.12-5.65) was a risk factor for failure in multivariable analysis for eyes receiving a standalone ab externo SIBS microshunt.

PrognosisCase seriesRetrospective, interventional case seriesn=164 eyes in 132 patientsCh41

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.01-6.23) was a risk factor for failure compared to secondary open-angle glaucoma (SOAG) in multivariable analysis for eyes receiving a standalone ab externo SIBS microshunt with mitomycin C.

PrognosisCase seriesRetrospective, interventional case seriesn=164 eyes in 132 patientsCh12Ch41

Needling was performed in 8.5% of eyes that received a standalone ab externo SIBS microshunt with mitomycin C during 1-year follow-up.

TreatmentCase seriesRetrospective, interventional case seriesn=164 eyes in 132 patientsCh41

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.