Comparison of refractive outcomes after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery: trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation.
Asano Shotaro, Koh Teck Chang Victor, Aquino Maria Cecilia, Lim Ka-Ann Dawn, Sng Chelvin Cheryl Anges, Loon Seng Chee, Chew Tec Kuan Paul
AI Summary
Combined cataract/GDD surgery had good refractive outcomes, similar to cataract surgery alone, except for short eyes. Trabeculectomy caused myopic error. This guides surgical planning for glaucoma patients.
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the refractive outcome of combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation compared with trabeculectomy and cataract surgery.
Setting
Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health System, Singapore.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Methods
206 eyes were enrolled for analysis: 50 had combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy (trabeculectomy group), 50 had combined cataract surgery and GDD implantation (GDD group), and 106 had cataract surgery alone (control group). Refractive prediction error and absolute prediction error of each glaucoma surgery group were compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis was performed in the following axial length (AL) subgroups: short (<22.5 mm), medium (≥22.5 to <25.5 mm), and long (≥25.5 mm).
Results
In total, 206 eyes were examined. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall refractive prediction error between the GDD (0.00 ± 0.54 diopters [D]) and the control group (0.10 ± 0.53 D, P = .58). There was significant myopic refractive prediction error in the trabeculectomy group (-0.18 ± 0.88 D, P = .020). In eyes with short AL, a greater absolute prediction error was observed in the GDD group (-0.75 ± 0.43 D, P = .039).
Conclusions
Apart from a significant deviation in short AL eyes, combined cataract surgery and GDD implantation demonstrated no significant postoperative refractive prediction error.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
There was no statistically significant difference in the overall refractive prediction error between the combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation group (0.00 0.54 diopters [D]) and the cataract surgery alone control group (0.10 0.53 D, P = .58) in a retrospective cohort study of 206 eyes.
There was a significant myopic refractive prediction error in the combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy group (-0.18 0.88 D, P = .020) compared to the cataract surgery alone control group in a retrospective cohort study of 206 eyes.
In eyes with short axial length (<22.5 mm), a greater absolute prediction error (-0.75 0.43 D, P = .039) was observed in the combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation group compared to the cataract surgery alone control group in a retrospective cohort study of 206 eyes.
Combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation demonstrated no significant postoperative refractive prediction error, apart from a significant deviation in short axial length eyes, in a retrospective cohort study of 206 eyes.
A retrospective cohort study compared refractive outcomes after combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation with combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy, and cataract surgery alone, enrolling 206 eyes.
Related Articles5
Clinical outcomes of Preserflo MicroShunt implant procedure in open‑angle glaucoma patients - a 1000 eyes case-series; including subanalysis of combined cataract-glaucoma surgery and standalone surgery in pseudophakic eyes.
Case SeriesSafety profile of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.
ReviewGlaucoma control after phacoemulsification in eyes with functioning glaucoma filtration surgeries: trabeculectomies versus glaucoma drainage devices.
Cohort StudyPractice Preferences for Glaucoma Surgery: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society.
Cross-Sectional StudyThree-Year Follow-up of a Novel Aqueous Humor MicroShunt.
Observational StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.