Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J Cataract Refract SurgSeptember 20211 citations

Comparison of refractive outcomes after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery: trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation.

Asano Shotaro, Koh Teck Chang Victor, Aquino Maria Cecilia, Lim Ka-Ann Dawn, Sng Chelvin Cheryl Anges, Loon Seng Chee, Chew Tec Kuan Paul


AI Summary

Combined cataract/GDD surgery had good refractive outcomes, similar to cataract surgery alone, except for short eyes. Trabeculectomy caused myopic error. This guides surgical planning for glaucoma patients.

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the refractive outcome of combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation compared with trabeculectomy and cataract surgery.

Setting

Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health System, Singapore.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

206 eyes were enrolled for analysis: 50 had combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy (trabeculectomy group), 50 had combined cataract surgery and GDD implantation (GDD group), and 106 had cataract surgery alone (control group). Refractive prediction error and absolute prediction error of each glaucoma surgery group were compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis was performed in the following axial length (AL) subgroups: short (<22.5 mm), medium (≥22.5 to <25.5 mm), and long (≥25.5 mm).

Results

In total, 206 eyes were examined. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall refractive prediction error between the GDD (0.00 ± 0.54 diopters [D]) and the control group (0.10 ± 0.53 D, P = .58). There was significant myopic refractive prediction error in the trabeculectomy group (-0.18 ± 0.88 D, P = .020). In eyes with short AL, a greater absolute prediction error was observed in the GDD group (-0.75 ± 0.43 D, P = .039).

Conclusions

Apart from a significant deviation in short AL eyes, combined cataract surgery and GDD implantation demonstrated no significant postoperative refractive prediction error.


MeSH Terms

CataractGlaucomaGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsHumansIntraocular PressureRetrospective StudiesTrabeculectomy

Key Concepts5

There was no statistically significant difference in the overall refractive prediction error between the combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation group (0.00  0.54 diopters [D]) and the cataract surgery alone control group (0.10  0.53 D, P = .58) in a retrospective cohort study of 206 eyes.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=206 eyes (50 GDD group, 106 control g…Ch42Ch44

There was a significant myopic refractive prediction error in the combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy group (-0.18  0.88 D, P = .020) compared to the cataract surgery alone control group in a retrospective cohort study of 206 eyes.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=206 eyes (50 trabeculectomy group, 10…Ch41Ch44

In eyes with short axial length (<22.5 mm), a greater absolute prediction error (-0.75  0.43 D, P = .039) was observed in the combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation group compared to the cataract surgery alone control group in a retrospective cohort study of 206 eyes.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=206 eyesCh42Ch44

Combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation demonstrated no significant postoperative refractive prediction error, apart from a significant deviation in short axial length eyes, in a retrospective cohort study of 206 eyes.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=206 eyesCh42Ch44

A retrospective cohort study compared refractive outcomes after combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation with combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy, and cataract surgery alone, enrolling 206 eyes.

MethodologyCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=206 eyes (50 trabeculectomy, 50 GDD, …Ch44

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.