Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Transl Vis Sci TechnolMarch 20260 citations

Alterations in Retinal Vasculometry After Acute Primary Angle Closure Episode: A Comparative Analysis.

Wang Jin, Wang Yue, Liu Zijian, Mou Dapeng, Tang Xin, Shi Danli, He Mingguang, Wang Ningli, Zhang Ye


AI Summary

APAC eyes show persistent retinal vasculometric changes (larger veins, altered fractal dimension/AV ratio) even after IOP control. These may be independent APAC risk factors, offering post-APAC monitoring via standard fundus photography.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate retinal vasculometry alterations in successfully treated acute primary angle closure (APAC) eyes versus unaffected fellow eyes.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study of 116 patients with unilateral APAC, retinal photographs obtained within two weeks after intraocular pressure (IOP) control were analyzed using deep learning-based software to evaluate retinal vascular parameters. The main outcome included caliber, density, complexity, tortuosity, and branching angle parameters.

Results

Compared to fellow eyes, APAC eyes showed larger retinal vein caliber (P < 0.001), increased length-to-diameter ratio in arteries and veins (P < 0.001 and = 0.001), and lower arteriovenous ratio from quantile 4 (AVRQ4) (P < 0.001). Additionally, APAC eyes demonstrated reduced bifurcation densities, fractal dimension (FD), and branching angle for arteries and veins (all P ≤ 0.005). Multivariate analysis identified three independent factors associated with APAC: higher IOP (odd ratio [OR] = 1.073, P = 0.003), lower AVRQ4 (OR = 0.957, P = 0.025), and decreased arterial FD (OR = 0.953, P = 0.028).

Conclusions

APAC eyes exhibit significant retinal vasculometry alterations despite IOP control. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether these alterations contribute to the development of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Translational relevance: The observed changes in artery-to-vein caliber ratio and arterial complexity may help clinicians identify eyes at risk for progressive damage despite normalized IOP. These findings support the development of supplementary monitoring strategies using standard fundus photography in post-APAC management.


MeSH Terms

HumansCross-Sectional StudiesMaleFemaleGlaucoma, Angle-ClosureMiddle AgedIntraocular PressureAgedRetinal VesselsAcute DiseaseRetinal Vein

Key Concepts4

Compared to fellow eyes, acute primary angle closure (APAC) eyes showed larger retinal vein caliber (P < 0.001), increased length-to-diameter ratio in arteries and veins (P < 0.001 and = 0.001), and lower arteriovenous ratio from quantile 4 (AVRQ4) (P < 0.001) in a cross-sectional study of 116 patients with unilateral APAC.

MechanismCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=116 patients with unilateral APACCh5Ch13

Acute primary angle closure (APAC) eyes demonstrated reduced bifurcation densities, fractal dimension (FD), and branching angle for arteries and veins (all P ≤ 0.005) compared to fellow eyes in a cross-sectional study of 116 patients with unilateral APAC.

MechanismCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=116 patients with unilateral APACCh5Ch13

Multivariate analysis identified three independent factors associated with acute primary angle closure (APAC) in a cross-sectional study of 116 patients: higher intraocular pressure (IOP) (odd ratio [OR] = 1.073, P = 0.003), lower arteriovenous ratio from quantile 4 (AVRQ4) (OR = 0.957, P = 0.025), and decreased arterial fractal dimension (FD) (OR = 0.953, P = 0.028).

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=116 patients with unilateral APACCh3Ch5Ch13

The observed changes in artery-to-vein caliber ratio and arterial complexity in acute primary angle closure (APAC) eyes may help clinicians identify eyes at risk for progressive damage despite normalized IOP, supporting the development of supplementary monitoring strategies using standard fundus photography in post-APAC management.

DiagnosisExpert OpinionTranslational relevance statementn=Not applicableCh5Ch13Ch28

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.