Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaSeptember 20218 citations

Comparison of the Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Epiretinal Membrane in Pseudoexfoliation and Primary Open-angle Glaucoma.

Lee Jin Yeong, Sung Kyung Rim, Kim Yoon Jeon


AI Summary

This study found epiretinal membrane (ERM) is significantly more prevalent in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) than in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or normal eyes. ERM presence also correlated with worse visual fields in PXG.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the prevalence and clinical characteristics of epiretinal membrane (ERM) in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods

In this retrospective observational study, 211 PXG eyes, 210 age-matched normal eyes, and 220 POAG eyes were included. The presence and staging of ERM (stage 1, 2, and 3 or greater) were independently assessed by 2 observers. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to assess the factors associated with visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) in PXG eyes.

Results

Among 211 PXG eyes, 40 (19.0%) had an ERM, while 4.1% of POAG and 2.4% of normal eyes had an ERM (P<0.001). Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (69.4 vs. 70.4 μm, P=0.477) and VF MD (-7.7 vs. -10.4 dB, P=0.098) were not different between POAG and PXG eyes but macular thickness was greater (259.5 vs. 271.5 μm, P=0.006) in PXG eyes than in POAG. Both lower retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (β=0.337, P<0.001) and the presence of an ERM (β=-4.246, P=0.002) were independently associated with worse VF MD in PXG eyes.

Conclusions

The prevalence of ERM was significantly greater in PXG eyes than in age-matched normal or POAG eyes. The presence of ERM affected VF in PXG eyes.


MeSH Terms

Cross-Sectional StudiesEpiretinal MembraneGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureOptic DiskPrevalenceTomography, Optical Coherence

Key Concepts4

The prevalence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) was significantly greater in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) eyes (19.0%, n=40/211) compared to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes (4.1%) and age-matched normal eyes (2.4%) (P<0.001).

EpidemiologyCohortRetrospective observational studyn=211 PXG eyes, 220 POAG eyes, 210 norm…Ch10Ch12Ch16

Macular thickness was significantly greater in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) eyes (271.5 µm) than in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes (259.5 µm) (P=0.006).

PrognosisCohortRetrospective observational studyn=211 PXG eyes, 220 POAG eyesCh5Ch12Ch16

Lower retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (β=0.337, P<0.001) and the presence of an epiretinal membrane (ERM) (β=-4.246, P=0.002) were independently associated with worse visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) eyes.

PrognosisCohortRetrospective observational study with multivariate linear regressionn=211 PXG eyesCh5Ch6Ch16

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (69.4 µm in POAG vs. 70.4 µm in PXG, P=0.477) and visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) (-7.7 dB in POAG vs. -10.4 dB in PXG, P=0.098) were not significantly different between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) eyes.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortRetrospective observational studyn=211 PXG eyes, 220 POAG eyesCh5Ch6Ch12Ch16

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.