Two Year Randomized Prospective Comparison of Ahmed Valve Versus Baerveldt Implant in Vitrectomized Eyes.
Kandarakis Stylianos A, Petrou Petros, Katsimpris Andreas, Papakonstantinou Evangelia, Timpilis Marios, Chronopoulou Konstantina, Lehman Amanda, Ifantides Cristos, Georgalas Ilias
AI Summary
Comparing Ahmed vs. Baerveldt implants in vitrectomized eyes, Baerveldt achieved lower IOP and fewer medications at 2 years, despite similar success rates and more complications, offering better IOP control.
Abstract
Prcis: Ahmed Valve and Baerveldt shunt are efficacious options in vitrectomized eyes. Baerveldt implant achieves a lower mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at 2 years, with fewer medications and a higher percentage of medication-free patients.
Purpose
To investigate and compare the efficacy and complications between Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) and Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) in vitrectomized eyes.
Materials and methods
In this single-center randomized clinical trial, 43 vitrectomized eyes (39 patients) underwent glaucoma drainage device implantation. Eyes were randomized to receive either an AGV (FP7) or a BGI (101-350) and were followed for 2 years. Surgical success was defined as an IOP measurement≤18 mm Hg and≥5 mm Hg with or without glaucoma medication at 2 or more sequential visits after 3 months. The primary outcome was the comparison of the success rate at 2 years, while mean IOP, mean number of medications, and number of complications were considered secondary outcomes.
Results
Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 2-year success rates in IOP control after GDD implantation were similar between the 2 groups; AGV group 81.8% (95% CI: 67.2%-99.6%) and BGI group 85.7% (95% CI: 72.0%-100.0%), (log-rank test P value = 0.74). Patients in the BGI group had a statistically significant lower mean IOP compared with the AGV group in all follow-up visits at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months (11.62 vs. 17.45 mm Hg at the latter P value <0.001). The BGI group required a significantly lower number of medications for IOP control at the 2-year visit compared with the AGV group (0.76±0.99 vs. 1.5±1.06 P value = 0.02) but had a higher number of complications (62% vs. 41%, respectively).
Conclusions
GDDs provide a viable solution for IOP control in vitrectomized eyes. Based on our prospective comparison, both Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve and Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant are efficacious options.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts6
In vitrectomized eyes, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 2-year success rates in intraocular pressure (IOP) control after glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation were similar between the Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) group (81.8%, 95% CI: 67.2%-99.6%) and the Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) group (85.7%, 95% CI: 72.0%-100.0%), with a log-rank test P value = 0.74.
In vitrectomized eyes, patients in the Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) group had a statistically significant lower mean intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with the Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) group in all follow-up visits at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months (11.62 vs. 17.45 mm Hg at 24 months, P value <0.001).
In vitrectomized eyes, the Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) group required a significantly lower number of medications for intraocular pressure (IOP) control at the 2-year visit compared with the Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) group (0.76±0.99 vs. 1.5±1.06, P value = 0.02).
In vitrectomized eyes, the Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) group had a higher number of complications (62%) compared to the Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) group (41%).
Glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) provide a viable solution for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in vitrectomized eyes.
Both Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve and Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant are efficacious options for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in vitrectomized eyes.
Related Articles5
One tube for all: 1-year outcomes after transition to Paul glaucoma implant at a tertiary centre.
Observational StudyLow-Cost New Glaucoma Drainage Device in Indonesia: One Year Follow-Up of 252 Subjects.
Observational StudyOne Year Results of the Preserflo MicroShunt Implantation for Refractory Glaucoma.
Clinical TrialTreatment outcomes in the neovascular glaucoma tube versus trabeculectomy study.
Randomized Controlled TrialThe outcomes of a low-cost, non-valved glaucoma drainage device using mitomycin-C: 1-year results.
Case SeriesIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.