Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaSeptember 20221 citations

Two Year Randomized Prospective Comparison of Ahmed Valve Versus Baerveldt Implant in Vitrectomized Eyes.

Kandarakis Stylianos A, Petrou Petros, Katsimpris Andreas, Papakonstantinou Evangelia, Timpilis Marios, Chronopoulou Konstantina, Lehman Amanda, Ifantides Cristos, Georgalas Ilias


AI Summary

Comparing Ahmed vs. Baerveldt implants in vitrectomized eyes, Baerveldt achieved lower IOP and fewer medications at 2 years, despite similar success rates and more complications, offering better IOP control.

Abstract

Prcis: Ahmed Valve and Baerveldt shunt are efficacious options in vitrectomized eyes. Baerveldt implant achieves a lower mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at 2 years, with fewer medications and a higher percentage of medication-free patients.

Purpose

To investigate and compare the efficacy and complications between Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) and Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) in vitrectomized eyes.

Materials and methods

In this single-center randomized clinical trial, 43 vitrectomized eyes (39 patients) underwent glaucoma drainage device implantation. Eyes were randomized to receive either an AGV (FP7) or a BGI (101-350) and were followed for 2 years. Surgical success was defined as an IOP measurement≤18 mm Hg and≥5 mm Hg with or without glaucoma medication at 2 or more sequential visits after 3 months. The primary outcome was the comparison of the success rate at 2 years, while mean IOP, mean number of medications, and number of complications were considered secondary outcomes.

Results

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 2-year success rates in IOP control after GDD implantation were similar between the 2 groups; AGV group 81.8% (95% CI: 67.2%-99.6%) and BGI group 85.7% (95% CI: 72.0%-100.0%), (log-rank test P value = 0.74). Patients in the BGI group had a statistically significant lower mean IOP compared with the AGV group in all follow-up visits at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months (11.62 vs. 17.45 mm Hg at the latter P value <0.001). The BGI group required a significantly lower number of medications for IOP control at the 2-year visit compared with the AGV group (0.76±0.99 vs. 1.5±1.06 P value = 0.02) but had a higher number of complications (62% vs. 41%, respectively).

Conclusions

GDDs provide a viable solution for IOP control in vitrectomized eyes. Based on our prospective comparison, both Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve and Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant are efficacious options.


MeSH Terms

HumansIntraocular PressureTreatment OutcomeFollow-Up StudiesProsthesis ImplantationPostoperative ComplicationsVisual AcuityGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucomaRetrospective StudiesOsteogenesis Imperfecta

Key Concepts6

In vitrectomized eyes, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 2-year success rates in intraocular pressure (IOP) control after glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation were similar between the Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) group (81.8%, 95% CI: 67.2%-99.6%) and the Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) group (85.7%, 95% CI: 72.0%-100.0%), with a log-rank test P value = 0.74.

Comparative EffectivenessRCTRandomized Clinical Trialn=43 vitrectomized eyes (39 patients)Ch27Ch42

In vitrectomized eyes, patients in the Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) group had a statistically significant lower mean intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with the Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) group in all follow-up visits at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months (11.62 vs. 17.45 mm Hg at 24 months, P value <0.001).

Comparative EffectivenessRCTRandomized Clinical Trialn=43 vitrectomized eyes (39 patients)Ch27Ch42

In vitrectomized eyes, the Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) group required a significantly lower number of medications for intraocular pressure (IOP) control at the 2-year visit compared with the Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) group (0.76±0.99 vs. 1.5±1.06, P value = 0.02).

Comparative EffectivenessRCTRandomized Clinical Trialn=43 vitrectomized eyes (39 patients)Ch27Ch42

In vitrectomized eyes, the Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) group had a higher number of complications (62%) compared to the Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) group (41%).

Comparative EffectivenessRCTRandomized Clinical Trialn=43 vitrectomized eyes (39 patients)Ch27Ch42

Glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) provide a viable solution for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in vitrectomized eyes.

TreatmentRCTRandomized Clinical Trialn=43 vitrectomized eyes (39 patients)Ch27Ch42

Both Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve and Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant are efficacious options for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in vitrectomized eyes.

TreatmentRCTRandomized Clinical Trialn=43 vitrectomized eyes (39 patients)Ch27Ch42

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.