Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Transl Vis Sci TechnolJanuary 20220 citations

Noninvasive Estimation of Pulsatile and Static Intracranial Pressure by Optical Coherence Tomography.

Jacobsen Henrik Holvin, Jørstad Øystein Kalsnes, Moe Morten C, Petrovski Goran, Pripp Are Hugo, Sandell Tiril, Eide Per Kristian


AI Summary

OCT parameters (pBA, ONHH) noninvasively predicted elevated pulsatile intracranial pressure (ICP) in IIH patients. This suggests OCT could offer a non-invasive way to monitor ICP, aiding diagnosis and management.

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the ability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to noninvasively estimate pulsatile and static intracranial pressure (ICP).

Methods

An OCT examination was performed in patients who underwent continuous overnight monitoring of the pulsatile and static ICP for diagnostic purpose. We included two patient groups, patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH; n = 20) and patients with no verified cerebrospinal fluid disturbances (reference; n = 12). Several OCT parameters were acquired using spectral-domain OCT (RS-3000 Advance; NIDEK, Singapore). The ICP measurements were obtained using a parenchymal sensor (Codman ICP MicroSensor; Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, MA, USA). The pulsatile ICP was determined as the mean ICP wave amplitude (MWA), and the static ICP was determined as the mean ICP.

Results

The peripapillary Bruch's membrane angle (pBA) and the optic nerve head height (ONHH) differed between the IIH and reference groups and correlated with both MWA and mean ICP. Both OCT parameters predicted elevated MWA. Area under the curve and cutoffs were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.98) and -0.65° (sensitivity/specificity; 0.75/0.92) for pBA and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.99) and 405 µm (0.88/0.67) for ONHH. Adjusting for age and body mass index resulted in nonsignificant predictive values for mean ICP, whereas the predictive value for MWA remained significant.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that the OCT parameters pBA and ONHH noninvasively can predict elevated pulsatile ICP, represented by the MWA.

Translational relevance: OCT shows promise as a method for noninvasive estimation of ICP.


MeSH Terms

HumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureOptic DiskPseudotumor CerebriTomography, Optical Coherence

Key Concepts5

The peripapillary Bruch's membrane angle (pBA) and the optic nerve head height (ONHH) differed between patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH; n = 20) and patients with no verified cerebrospinal fluid disturbances (reference; n = 12).

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=32 patients (20 IIH, 12 reference)Ch5Ch8

The peripapillary Bruch's membrane angle (pBA) and the optic nerve head height (ONHH) correlated with both mean ICP wave amplitude (MWA) and mean intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients undergoing continuous overnight monitoring of pulsatile and static ICP.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=32 patients (20 IIH, 12 reference)Ch3Ch5

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters, peripapillary Bruch's membrane angle (pBA) and optic nerve head height (ONHH), predicted elevated mean ICP wave amplitude (MWA) with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66-0.98) for pBA and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.99) for ONHH.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=32 patients (20 IIH, 12 reference)Ch3Ch5

The cutoff for peripapillary Bruch's membrane angle (pBA) to predict elevated mean ICP wave amplitude (MWA) was -0.65° (sensitivity/specificity; 0.75/0.92), and for optic nerve head height (ONHH) was 405 µm (sensitivity/specificity; 0.88/0.67).

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=32 patients (20 IIH, 12 reference)Ch3Ch5

After adjusting for age and body mass index, the predictive value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters for mean intracranial pressure (ICP) became nonsignificant, while the predictive value for mean ICP wave amplitude (MWA) remained significant.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=32 patients (20 IIH, 12 reference)Ch3Ch5

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.