Despite Impaired Binocular Function, Binocular Disparity Integration Across the Visual Field Is Spared in Normal Aging and Glaucoma.
AI Summary
Glaucoma causes widespread loss of disparity sensitivity, even centrally. However, the brain's ability to integrate remaining binocular information is preserved, suggesting optimal use of impaired vision.
Abstract
Purpose
To examine how binocularly asymmetric glaucomatous visual field damage affects binocular disparity processing across the visual field.
Methods
We recruited 18 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, 16 age-matched controls, and 13 young controls. Participants underwent standard clinical assessments of binocular visual acuity, binocular contrast sensitivity, stereoacuity, and perimetry. We employed a previously validated psychophysical procedure to measure how sensitivity to binocular disparity varied across spatial frequencies and visual field sectors (i.e., with full-field stimuli spanning the central 21° of the visual field and with stimuli restricted to annular regions spanning 0°-3°, 3°-9°, or 9°-21°). We employed measurements with annular stimuli to model different possible scenarios regarding how disparity information is combined across visual field sectors. We adjudicated between potential mechanisms by comparing model predictions to the patterns observed with full-field stimuli.
Results
Perimetry confirmed that patients with glaucoma exhibited binocularly asymmetric visual field damage (P < 0.001). Across participant groups, foveal regions preferentially processed disparities at finer spatial scales, whereas periphery regions were tuned for coarser scales (P < 0.001). Disparity sensitivity also decreased from fovea to periphery (P < 0.001) and across participant groups (Ps < 0.01). Finally, similar to controls, patients with glaucoma exhibited near-optimal disparity integration, specifically at low spatial frequencies (P < 0.001).
Conclusions
Contrary to the conventional view that glaucoma spares central vision, we find that glaucomatous damage causes a widespread loss of disparity sensitivity across both foveal and peripheral regions. Despite these losses, cortical integration mechanisms appear to be well preserved, suggesting that patients with glaucoma make the best possible use of their remaining binocular function.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts6
Perimetry confirmed that patients with glaucoma (n=18) exhibited binocularly asymmetric visual field damage (P < 0.001).
Across participant groups (18 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, 16 age-matched controls, and 13 young controls), foveal regions preferentially processed disparities at finer spatial scales, whereas periphery regions were tuned for coarser scales (P < 0.001).
Disparity sensitivity decreased from fovea to periphery (P < 0.001) and across participant groups (18 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, 16 age-matched controls, and 13 young controls) (Ps < 0.01).
Similar to controls, patients with glaucoma (n=18) exhibited near-optimal disparity integration, specifically at low spatial frequencies (P < 0.001).
Glaucomatous damage causes a widespread loss of disparity sensitivity across both foveal and peripheral regions in patients with glaucoma (n=18).
Cortical integration mechanisms appear to be well preserved in patients with glaucoma (n=18), suggesting that they make the best possible use of their remaining binocular function.
Related Articles5
Archetypal Analysis Reveals Consistent Visual Field Patterns for Stimulus Sizes III and V in Glaucoma and NAION.
Observational StudyIdentifying Factors Associated With Fast Visual Field Progression in Patients With Ocular Hypertension Based on Unsupervised Machine Learning.
Cohort StudyOptic Disc Microvasculature Reduction and Visual Field Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Case SeriesCan Artificial Intelligence Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression? A Spatial-Ordinal Convolutional Neural Network Model.
Cohort StudyBiomechanical Glaucoma Factor and Corneal Hysteresis in Treated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Their Associations With Visual Field Progression.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.