Reporting outcomes of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.

Purpose of review: This review presents guidelines for designing studies and reporting efficacy and safety outcomes in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) research.

Recent findings: Adherence to reporting guidelines in MIGS studies is crucial for providers and patients to appraise surgical options. Recent guidelines have outlined appropriate methodology, efficacy outcomes, and safety reporting, so that study results are presented in an interpretable and uniform manner.

Summary

MIGS are changing the glaucoma treatment paradigm by offering safer, less invasive alternatives to traditional filtering surgery. However, inconsistent reporting of outcomes in MIGS trials hampers comparison and clinical decision-making. Recent guidelines have aimed to highlight appropriate methodology and encourage standardization in reporting outcomes to improve the quality of MIGS literature. Key considerations include defining baseline intraocular pressure, reporting standardized demographic data, using consistent endpoints, presenting standardized figures, evaluating medication use, and documenting adverse events. By adhering to these guidelines, MIGS trials can offer clearer insights into surgical outcomes, aiding both surgeons and patients in treatment decisions.