Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness and Visual Function in Chronic Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.
Hedström Johan, Nilsson Maria, Engvall Martin, Williams Pete A, Venkataraman Abinaya Priya
AI Summary
Manually correcting OCT segmentation of GCC in chronic LHON revealed strong correlations between GCC thickness and visual function, highlighting the need for accurate measurements to monitor disease and treatment effects.
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the correlation between the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness measured with manually corrected segmentation and visual function in individuals with chronic Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON).
Methods
Twenty-six chronic LHON subjects (60% treated with idebenone or Q10) from the Swedish LHON registry were enrolled. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field tests, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. Visual field was evaluated with the Haag-Streit Octopus 900 with the Esterman test and a custom 30° test. Canon OCT-HS100 scans were exported to the Iowa Reference Algorithm. GCC thickness was obtained after the segmentation was corrected manually in nine macular sectors.
Results
The GCC thickness was overestimated by 16 to 30 µm in different macular sectors with the automated segmentation compared with the corrected (P < 0.001). GCC thickness in all sectors showed significant correlation with all functional parameters. The strongest correlation was seen for the external temporal sector (BCVA: r = 0.604, P < 0.001; mean defect: r = 0.457, P = 0.001; Esterman score: r = 0.421, P = 0.003). No differences were seen between treated and untreated subjects with regard to GCC and visual field scores (P > 0.05), but BCVA was better among treated subjects (P = 0.017).
Conclusions
The corrected GCC thickness showed correlation with visual function in chronic LHON subjects. The frequently occurring segmentation errors in OCT measurements related to chronic LHON can potentially be misleading in monitoring of disease progression and in evaluating the treatment effects. Precise measurements of GCC could serve as a sensitive tool to monitor structural changes in LHON. We therefore emphasize the importance of careful evaluation of the accuracy of OCT segmentation.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
The macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness was overestimated by 16 to 30 µm in different macular sectors with automated segmentation compared with manually corrected segmentation (P < 0.001) in 26 chronic Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) subjects.
Manually corrected macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in all sectors showed significant correlation with all functional parameters (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field tests) in 26 chronic Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) subjects.
The strongest correlation between manually corrected macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness and visual function in 26 chronic Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) subjects was seen for the external temporal sector (BCVA: r = 0.604, P < 0.001; mean defect: r = 0.457, P = 0.001; Esterman score: r = 0.421, P = 0.003).
No differences were seen between idebenone or Q10 treated and untreated subjects with regard to macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) and visual field scores (P > 0.05) in 26 chronic Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) subjects (60% treated).
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was better among idebenone or Q10 treated subjects (P = 0.017) compared to untreated subjects in 26 chronic Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) subjects (60% treated).
Related Articles5
Evaluation of visual function and OCT parameters in ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy: a longitudinal study.
Cohort StudyPrimary Visual Pathway Changes in Individuals With Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Case-Control StudyEvaluating glaucoma in myopic eyes: Challenges and opportunities.
ReviewRetinal Perfusion and Injury in Sepsis and after Major Surgery.
Observational StudyComparison of structure-function correlation among IMO visual function analyser and Humphrey field analyser.
Cross-Sectional StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.