Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Am J OphthalmolMay 20242 citations

Frequency of Agreement Between Structural and Functional Glaucoma Testing: A Longitudinal Study of 3D OCT and Current Clinical Tests.

Manik Dhruv, Ratanawongphaibul Kitiya, Kim Janice, Tsikata Edem, Lee Hang, Margeta Milica A, Ondeck Courtney L, De Boer Johannes F, Chen Teresa C


AI Summary

This study found structural and functional glaucoma tests rarely detect progression simultaneously. Clinically, this means progression is often observed by only one or two tests at a given visit.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate how often tests of structure and function detect glaucoma progression at the same study visit. Tests include current glaucoma clinical tests and a new 3-dimensional (3D) optical coherence tomography (OCT) rim measurement.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Methods

For 124 open-angle glaucoma patients at a single institution, one eye was randomly selected for each patient. Patients were included if they had open-angle glaucoma and if they had at least 4 yearly study visits. Study visits included a full dilated eye exam, disc photography (DP), Humphrey visual field (HVF 24-2) testing, 2D OCT retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness measurements, and 3D OCT neuroretinal rim measurements (i.e., minimum distance band or MDB). For each test at each study visit, eyes were classified as progressors or non-progressors using event-based analysis. Agreement occurred if tests progressed in the same eye at the same study visit. Agreements between all compared tests were calculated as percentages of agreement.

Results

The study included 124 open-angle glaucoma eyes, which had an average follow-up period of 66.9 ± 16.4 months. Structural tests (i.e., DP, global RNFL thickness, and global MDB rim thickness) progressed at the same visit as the functional test (i.e., HVF testing) in only 5.0% (3/60) to 16.0% (13/81) of eyes. Global MDB thickness and global RNFL thickness showed similar agreement with functional HVF testing (i.e., 16.0% [13/81] and 8.3% [7/84], respectively), and global MDB thickness showed better structure-function agreement with HVF testing than between DP and HVF testing (i.e., 5.0% [3/60], P = 0.04). For all paired comparisons between testing methods, eyes with moderate glaucoma showed similar or better agreement than eyes with mild or severe glaucoma.

Conclusions

Clinical tests of structure and function do not usually progress at the same clinic visit. Most of the time, glaucoma progression is only detected by one or two tests.


MeSH Terms

HumansTomography, Optical CoherenceGlaucoma, Open-AngleProspective StudiesVisual FieldsRetinal Ganglion CellsNerve FibersFemaleMaleOptic DiskVisual Field TestsIntraocular PressureMiddle AgedDisease ProgressionImaging, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of ResultsAgedOptic Nerve DiseasesPhotographyFollow-Up StudiesTonometry, Ocular

Key Concepts5

Structural tests (disc photography, global retinal nerve fibre layer thickness, and global minimum distance band rim thickness) progressed at the same visit as the functional test (Humphrey visual field testing) in only 5.0% (3/60) to 16.0% (13/81) of open-angle glaucoma eyes.

PrognosisCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=124 open-angle glaucoma eyesCh5Ch6Ch12

Global minimum distance band (MDB) thickness showed similar agreement with functional Humphrey visual field testing (16.0% [13/81]) and global retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness (8.3% [7/84]) in open-angle glaucoma eyes.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=124 open-angle glaucoma eyesCh5Ch6Ch12

Global minimum distance band (MDB) thickness showed better structure-function agreement with Humphrey visual field (HVF) testing than between disc photography (DP) and HVF testing (5.0% [3/60], P = 0.04) in open-angle glaucoma eyes.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=124 open-angle glaucoma eyesCh5Ch6Ch12

For all paired comparisons between testing methods, open-angle glaucoma eyes with moderate glaucoma showed similar or better agreement than eyes with mild or severe glaucoma regarding progression.

PrognosisCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=124 open-angle glaucoma eyesCh5Ch6Ch12

Clinical tests of structure and function for glaucoma do not usually progress at the same clinic visit; most of the time, glaucoma progression is only detected by one or two tests.

PrognosisCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=124 open-angle glaucoma eyesCh5Ch6Ch12

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.