Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-Like Structures in Stickler Syndrome.
Khatib Tasneem Z, Safi Antoine, Nixon Thomas Ralph William, Georgoulas Stylianos, Montesano Giovanni, Martin Howard, Richards Allan J, McNinch Annie, Poulson Arabella V, Alexander Philip
AI Summary
This study found peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) in 91% of Stickler syndrome patients' eyes. This novel finding suggests PHOMS are a common optic disc anomaly in Stickler syndrome, aiding diagnosis and management.
Abstract
Purpose
To report a previously undescribed finding of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) in Stickler syndrome.
Design
Noncomparative case series.
Subjects
Twenty-two eyes with anomalous optic disc from 11 Stickler syndrome patients were identified and imaged.
Methods
Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were graded using enhanced-depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) according to the consensus recommendations of the Optic Disc Drusen Studies Consortium. All EDI-OCT scans were obtained using the Heidelberg Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering) with a dense horizontal raster (15 × 10°, 97 sections) centered on the optic nerve head and graded by 2 independent assessors. In case of disagreement, the image was graded by a third assessor. The presence of any coexisting optic disc drusen was also assessed using EDI-OCT and autofluorescence.
Main outcome measures
The presence of PHOMS, clinical characteristics and genetic mutations.
Results
A pilot sample of 22 eyes with phenotypic optic disc abnormalities from 11 Stickler syndrome patients were identified and imaged. Eight patients were female and 3 were male. The mean age was 31 years (13-58 years). Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were present in 91% (n = 20) of imaged eyes. Seventy percent (n = 14) were type 1 Stickler syndrome and 30% (n = 6) were type 2 Stickler syndrome. All eyes were myopic and the degree of myopia did not seem to affect whether or not PHOMS was present in this cohort. One eye with PHOMS had retinal detachment, and 77.3% (n = 17) of eyes had undergone 360 o prophylactic retinopexy. Thirty-two percent (n = 7) of eyes with PHOMS were present in patients with coexisting hearing loss and 22.7% (n = 5) had orofacial manifestation of Stickler syndrome in the form of a cleft palate. Seventy-seven percent (n = 15) of eyes with PHOMS were present in patients who reported joint laxity or symptoms of arthritis. No coexisting optic disc drusen were identified and raised intracranial pressure was also excluded after neurological investigation.
Conclusions
These data suggest that PHOMS are a novel finding in Stickler syndrome patients and should be considered when evaluating the optic nerves of these patients.
Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) were present in 91% (n = 20) of 22 imaged eyes with anomalous optic disc from 11 Stickler syndrome patients.
In a pilot sample of 22 eyes from 11 Stickler syndrome patients, 70% (n = 14) of eyes with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) were from type 1 Stickler syndrome patients and 30% (n = 6) were from type 2 Stickler syndrome patients.
All 22 eyes with anomalous optic disc from 11 Stickler syndrome patients were myopic, and the degree of myopia did not appear to affect the presence of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) in this cohort.
In a pilot sample of 22 eyes from 11 Stickler syndrome patients, one eye with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) had retinal detachment, and 77.3% (n = 17) of eyes had undergone 360-degree prophylactic retinopexy.
In a pilot sample of 22 eyes from 11 Stickler syndrome patients, 32% (n = 7) of eyes with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) were present in patients with coexisting hearing loss, and 22.7% (n = 5) had orofacial manifestation of Stickler syndrome in the form of a cleft palate.
Related Articles5
Optic Nerve Head Morphological Variation in Craniosynostosis: A Cohort Study.
Cohort StudyIn Vivo Assessment of Retinal Phenotypes in Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome.
Observational StudyOptic disk elevation in Down's syndrome.
Case SeriesPseudopapilledema in neurofibromatosis type 2.
Case ReportSepto-optic dysplasia in two siblings.
Case SeriesIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.