Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Am J OphthalmolAugust 20242 citations

Optic Nerve Head Morphological Variation in Craniosynostosis: A Cohort Study.

Rufai Sohaib R, Thomas Mervyn G, Marmoy Oliver R, Panteli Vasiliki, Thompson Dorothy A, Bunce Catey, Henderson Robert H, Gore Sri, James Greg, Gottlob Irene


AI Summary

This study found children with craniosynostosis have distinct optic nerve head morphology, especially in FGFR1/2 syndromes, which could improve ophthalmological monitoring and surgical decisions.

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate optic nerve head (ONH) morphology in children with craniosynostosis versus healthy controls.

Design

Single-center, prospective cohort study.

Methods

Handheld optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed in 110 eyes of 58 children (aged 0-13 years) with craniosynostosis. Inclusion criteria were as follows: normal intracranial pressure on invasive overnight monitoring, or clinically stable intracranial pressure. The latter was defined as stable VA within 1 logMAR line and no papilledema on fundoscopy for at least 4 months following OCT, and normal/stable visual evoked potentials. Control data for 218 eyes of 218 children were obtained from a published normative dataset. The main outcome measures were disc width, cup width, rim width, and retinal nerve layer thickness (nasal and temporal). Outcome measures were compared using three-way linear mixed model regression analysis (fibroblast growth factor receptor [FGFR] 1/2-associated craniosynostosis, non-FGFR 1/2-associated craniosynostosis, and controls).

Results

Out of 63 eligible children with craniosynostosis, handheld OCT imaging was successful in 110 eyes of 58 children (92%). Of these, 22 (38%) were female. Median subject age at OCT examination was 53 months (range: 2-157; IQR: 39-73). Twelve children (21%) had FGFR1/2-associated syndromes (Crouzon, n = 6; Apert, n = 4; Pfeiffer, n = 2). Control data were available for 218 eyes of 218 healthy children. 122 controls (56%) were female. Median control age at OCT examination was 20 months (range: 0-163; IQR: 6-59). When comparing ONH morphology in craniosynostosis (n = 58) versus controls (n = 218), disc width was 6% greater (P = .001), temporal cup width was 13% smaller (P = .027), rim width was 16% greater (P < .001) and temporal retinal nerve fiber layer was 11% smaller (P = .027). When comparing FGFR1/2-associated syndromes (Crouzon, Apert, and Pfeiffer syndromes, n = 12) to the rest of the craniosynostosis group (n = 46), disc width was 10% smaller (P = .014) and temporal cup width was 38% smaller (P = .044).

Conclusions

This cohort demonstrated morphological differences of the ONH in craniosynostosis, most markedly in Crouzon, Apert, and Pfeiffer syndromes. These findings could help improve ophthalmological monitoring and surgical decision-making in children with craniosynostosis. Further work on longitudinal ONH changes in syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis would be valuable.


MeSH Terms

HumansFemaleTomography, Optical CoherenceCraniosynostosesMaleOptic DiskProspective StudiesChildInfantChild, PreschoolAdolescentIntracranial PressureInfant, NewbornVisual AcuityReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2Retinal Ganglion CellsNerve Fibers

Key Concepts6

When comparing optic nerve head (ONH) morphology in children with craniosynostosis (n = 58) versus healthy controls (n = 218), disc width was 6% greater (P = .001) in children with craniosynostosis.

PrognosisCohortProspective Cohortn=58 children with craniosynostosis, 21…Ch5

When comparing optic nerve head (ONH) morphology in children with craniosynostosis (n = 58) versus healthy controls (n = 218), temporal cup width was 13% smaller (P = .027) in children with craniosynostosis.

PrognosisCohortProspective Cohortn=58 children with craniosynostosis, 21…Ch5

When comparing optic nerve head (ONH) morphology in children with craniosynostosis (n = 58) versus healthy controls (n = 218), rim width was 16% greater (P < .001) in children with craniosynostosis.

PrognosisCohortProspective Cohortn=58 children with craniosynostosis, 21…Ch5

When comparing optic nerve head (ONH) morphology in children with craniosynostosis (n = 58) versus healthy controls (n = 218), temporal retinal nerve fiber layer was 11% smaller (P = .027) in children with craniosynostosis.

PrognosisCohortProspective Cohortn=58 children with craniosynostosis, 21…Ch5

When comparing children with FGFR1/2-associated syndromes (Crouzon, Apert, and Pfeiffer syndromes, n = 12) to the rest of the craniosynostosis group (n = 46), disc width was 10% smaller (P = .014) and temporal cup width was 38% smaller (P = .044) in children with FGFR1/2-associated syndromes.

PrognosisCohortProspective Cohortn=12 children with FGFR1/2-associated s…Ch5Ch15

Handheld optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was successful in 110 eyes of 58 children (92%) out of 63 eligible children with craniosynostosis.

MethodologyCohortProspective Cohortn=110 eyes of 58 children with craniosy…Ch5

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.