Outcomes of Nonpenetrating Versus Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy in Open Angle Glaucoma.
Merlo Pich Francesco Giorgio, Oliverio Leandro, Gillmann Kevin, Mermoud André
AI Summary
This study found that NPDS and PDS surgeries for open-angle glaucoma achieve similar IOP reduction, but NPDS offers a superior safety profile with faster visual recovery and fewer complications, making it a safer option.
Abstract
Précis: In this retrospective study, nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) interventions showed similar >90% complete success rates at 1-year postsurgery. However, NPDS achieved a superior safety profile in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recovery and rates of post-surgical complications.
Objective
Comparing the surgical outcomes of 2 surgical techniques: NPDS and PDS.
Patients and methods: This was a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study including 66 eyes from 57 patients aged 69 ± 9 years who underwent either NPDS or PDS for medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma. Outcome measurements included intraocular pressure (IOP), BCVA, rates of complications, postoperative corrective interventions, and glaucoma medications at baseline and at all postoperative appointments up to 1 year. An exploratory mixed-effect model was used to assess the intergroup differences between IOP and BCVA.
Results
One-year postsurgery, a similar significant IOP reduction from baseline was observed in NPDS (from 19.9 ± 1.3 to 11.5 ± 0.9 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and PDS (from 19.5 ± 1.1 to 10.7 ± 0.6 mm Hg, P < 0.001). A conservative complete success rate (defined as medicated IOP ≤16 mm Hg and ≥20% reduction in IOP) was 87% for NPDS and 97% for PDS. No BCVA changes were observed between baseline and 1-year postsurgery in both groups, and glaucoma medications showed a similar 10-fold reduction in both groups ( P < 0.001 vs baseline). However, a significant difference in the speed of postoperative BVCA recovery was observed between NPDS and PDS ( P < 0.01), with NPDS showing a faster recovery. Moreover, lower numbers of postsurgical complications and postoperative interventions were observed after NPDS compared with PDS [NPDS, n = 30 and 34 vs PDS, n = 80 and 48 ( P < 0.05), respectively].
Conclusions
The present study confirmed that both NPDS and PDS are highly effective surgical interventions for the management of primary open angle glaucoma. However, NPDS had a superior safety profile in terms of BCVA recovery, complication rates, and postoperative interventions.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
In a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study including 66 eyes from 57 patients aged 69 ± 9 years, nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) interventions for medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma showed similar >90% complete success rates at 1-year postsurgery.
In a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study of 66 eyes from 57 patients with medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma, nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) achieved a superior safety profile compared to penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recovery and rates of post-surgical complications.
One-year postsurgery, a significant intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction from baseline was observed in both nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) (from 19.9 ± 1.3 to 11.5 ± 0.9 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) (from 19.5 ± 1.1 to 10.7 ± 0.6 mm Hg, P < 0.001) in a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study of 66 eyes from 57 patients with medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma.
In a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study of 66 eyes from 57 patients with medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma, a significant difference in the speed of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recovery was observed between nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) (P < 0.01), with NPDS showing a faster recovery.
In a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study of 66 eyes from 57 patients with medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma, lower numbers of postsurgical complications and postoperative interventions were observed after nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) compared with penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) [NPDS, n = 30 and 34 vs PDS, n = 80 and 48 (P < 0.05), respectively].
Related Articles5
Efficacy and complications of microcatheter-assisted minimally invasive glaucoma surgery for open-angle glaucoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Systematic ReviewEfficacy of Filtration Surgery and Risk Factors for Central Visual Field Deterioration in Highly Myopic Eyes With Open Angle Glaucoma.
Cohort StudyEfficacy and safety of penetrating canaloplasty versus ab externo canaloplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma: A randomized controlled trial.
Randomized Controlled TrialOne-Year Outcomes of Preserflo Microshunt for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Systematic ReviewFive-year follow-up with the PreserFlo MicroShunt for open-angle glaucoma.
Case SeriesIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.