Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Transl Vis Sci TechnolJanuary 20242 citations

Detecting Established Glaucoma Using OCT Alone: Utilizing an OCT Reading Center in a Real-World Clinical Setting.

Leshno Ari, Tsamis Emmanouil, Hirji Sitara, Gomide Gabriel A, Harizman Noga, De Moraes Carlos Gustavo, Garg Shukla Aakriti, Cioffi George A, Hood Donald C, Liebmann Jeffrey M


AI Summary

An OCT reading center accurately identified established glaucoma with high sensitivity and specificity using OCT alone, validating its real-world clinical utility for detection.

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the ability of an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based reading center for glaucoma (ORG) to detect established glaucoma using OCT alone.

Methods

This study included eyes from 70 consecutive patients with established glaucoma (i.e. moderate or severe glaucoma according to the International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-10 guidelines) and 20 consecutive healthy subjects, who had no evidence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) or visual field (VF) loss in either eye. Using a standardized ORG quality assessment, 33 eyes were excluded due to media opacity (12), poor image quality (13), or epiretinal membrane (8). Of the remaining 147 eyes, 86 had established glaucoma and 36 were from healthy controls (total n = 122). Based on the OCT report alone and applying a previously described evaluation method, the presence of GON in each eye was determined by two masked ORG graders. The main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity for detection of eyes with established glaucoma.

Results

Of the 86 eyes with established glaucoma (average mean deviation [MD] = -10.9 ± 7.7 dB, range = -0.5 to -31.5 dB), only one eye (MD = -0.46) was missed (sensitivity = 98.8%). However, the other eye of this patient was correctly classified as GON. Therefore, at a patient level, sensitivity was 100%. None of the 36 healthy eyes was classified as GON by the ORG (specificity = 100%).

Conclusions

An OCT-based reading center is able to identify eyes with established glaucoma using OCT alone with high sensitivity and specificity.

Translational relevance: Our study validates the use of a systematic OCT-based approach for glaucoma detection in a real-world setting.


MeSH Terms

HumansEyeGlaucomaOptic Nerve DiseasesTomography, Optical Coherence

Key Concepts5

An optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based reading center for glaucoma (ORG) achieved a sensitivity of 98.8% for detecting established glaucoma in 86 eyes with established glaucoma (average mean deviation [MD] = -10.9  7.7 dB, range = -0.5 to -31.5 dB).

DiagnosisCohortCross-sectional studyn=86 eyes with established glaucomaCh5Ch7

An optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based reading center for glaucoma (ORG) achieved a patient-level sensitivity of 100% for detecting established glaucoma, as only one eye (MD = -0.46) was missed out of 86 eyes with established glaucoma, and the other eye of this patient was correctly classified as glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON).

DiagnosisCohortCross-sectional studyn=86 eyes with established glaucomaCh5Ch7

An optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based reading center for glaucoma (ORG) achieved a specificity of 100% for detecting established glaucoma, as none of the 36 healthy eyes were classified as glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON).

DiagnosisCohortCross-sectional studyn=36 healthy eyesCh5Ch7

A study evaluating the ability of an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based reading center for glaucoma (ORG) to detect established glaucoma included eyes from 70 consecutive patients with established glaucoma (moderate or severe according to ICD-10 guidelines) and 20 consecutive healthy subjects.

MethodologyCohortCross-sectional studyn=70 patients with established glaucoma…Ch10

In a study evaluating an OCT-based reading center for glaucoma, 33 eyes were excluded from the analysis due to media opacity (12 eyes), poor image quality (13 eyes), or epiretinal membrane (8 eyes), based on a standardized ORG quality assessment.

MethodologyCohortCross-sectional studyn=33 excluded eyesCh5

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.