Mid-term real world outcomes of the Hydrus ® Microstent in open angle glaucoma.
Kiramira David, Voßmerbäumer Urs, Pfeiffer Norbert, Linnerth-Braun Lea K M, Lorenz Katrin, Prokosch Verena
AI Summary
This study found the Hydrus Microstent safely and effectively lowered IOP and medication dependence in open-angle glaucoma patients mid-term, offering a viable treatment option with some limitations.
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the mid-term clinical results and the safety aspects of the Hydrus ® Microstent (Ivantis, Inc, Irvine, CA) in a real-life setting.
Design
Retrospective case series.
Methods
Hydrus ® Microstent was implanted in phakic eyes (88 eyes, 87.1%) and in pseudophakic eyes (13 eyes, 12.9%), respectively. Mean follow-up time was 16 ± 9 months with 27 eyes having a follow-up time of more than 24 months.
Main outcome measures
The primary endpoint was reduction in IOP compared to baseline. Target IOP levels were set at ≤20 mmHg, ≤18 mmHg and ≤15 mmHg. Kaplan-Meier survival was defined as a reduction in IOP of ≥20% compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints were reduction in number of glaucoma medications and safety assessments addressing visual acuity, adverse events, re-surgery rate and identification of factors that made the implantation more difficult.
Result: 101 eyes underwent Hydrus ® implantation. The mean preoperative IOP was 21.60 mmHg (SD 6.6) on 2.18 (SD 1.3) medications. After a mean follow up time of 16 months, the mean IOP was reduced to 14.61 ± 3.7 mmHg on 1.12 (SD 1.1) medication classes (p < 0.001). Mean decrease in IOP was 26.7%. Analysis of the target IOP levels showed that in 29%, 34% and 35% of cases an IOP of ≤15 mmHg, ≤18 mmHg and ≤20 mmHg respectively could be achieved. BCVA improved from 0.56 ± 0.3 at baseline to 0.85 ± 0.3 more than 24 months after surgery (p < 0.001). The rate of re-operation was low at <3%. Adverse events occurred in 4 eyes (<4%).
Conclusion
This study underlines the effectiveness and the safety of the Hydrus ® Microstent in an elective setting, but it also demonstrates certain limits and risk factors of this procedure.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts6
After Hydrus® Microstent implantation, the mean IOP was reduced to 14.61 ± 3.7 mmHg from a mean preoperative IOP of 21.60 mmHg (SD 6.6), and the mean number of medications was reduced to 1.12 (SD 1.1) from 2.18 (SD 1.3) medication classes, after a mean follow-up time of 16 months (p < 0.001) in a retrospective case series of 101 eyes.
The Hydrus® Microstent achieved a mean decrease in IOP of 26.7% compared to baseline in a retrospective case series of 101 eyes.
After Hydrus® Microstent implantation, target IOP levels of ≤15 mmHg, ≤18 mmHg, and ≤20 mmHg were achieved in 29%, 34%, and 35% of cases, respectively, in a retrospective case series of 101 eyes.
In a retrospective case series of 101 eyes undergoing Hydrus® Microstent implantation, the rate of re-operation was low at <3%, and adverse events occurred in 4 eyes (<4%), indicating a favorable safety profile.
The Hydrus® Microstent (Ivantis, Inc, Irvine, CA) was implanted in 101 eyes, consisting of 88 phakic eyes (87.1%) and 13 pseudophakic eyes (12.9%), with a mean follow-up time of 16 ± 9 months in a retrospective case series.
In a retrospective case series of 101 eyes, the mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was 21.60 mmHg (SD 6.6) on 2.18 (SD 1.3) medications prior to Hydrus® Microstent implantation.
Related Articles5
Five-year outcomes of ab interno Xen 45 gel stent implantation.
Cohort StudyStandalone XEN45 Gel Stent implantation versus combined XEN45-phacoemulsification in the treatment of open angle glaucoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Systematic ReviewTwelve-month outcomes of an ab interno gelatin stent combined with cataract surgery or as a standalone procedure in pseudophakic eyes with open-angle glaucoma.
Cohort StudyCombined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C.
Case SeriesThree-year canaloplasty outcomes for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: European study results.
Clinical TrialIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.