Deep Learning Estimation of 24-2 Visual Field Map From Optic Nerve Head Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.
Mahmoudinezhad Golnoush, Moghimi Sasan, Ru Liyang, Yong Yu Xuan, Yang Dongchen, Cheng Jiacheng, Beheshtaein Siavash, Walker Evan, Latif Kareem, Du Kelvin H
AI Summary
Deep learning accurately estimated visual fields from optic nerve OCTA images, outperforming traditional methods. This could potentially reduce the frequency of visual field testing for glaucoma patients.
Abstract
Précis: Artificial intelligence applied to OCTA images demonstrated high accuracy in estimating 24-2 visual field maps by leveraging information from the parapapillary area.
Purpose
To develop deep learning (DL) models estimating 24-2 visual field (VF) maps from optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) optic nerve head (ONH) en face images.
Methods
A total of 3148 VF OCTA pairs were collected from 994 participants (1684 eyes). DL models were trained using radial peripapillary capillary (RPC), superficial, and choroidal, as well as combined ONH VD layers, to estimate 24-2 mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), 52 total deviation (TD), and pattern deviation (PD) values and compared with a linear regression (LR) model. Model accuracy was assessed by calculating mean absolute error (MAE) and R (Pearson correlation coefficient) between estimated and actual VF values.
Results
DL models outperformed LR estimates for the estimation of VF values using individual and combined layers ( P <0.001). For example, in the estimation of MD using RPC, DL achieved an R of 0.79 and MAEs of 1.77 dB. Average estimated TDs using RPC had R of 0.63 and MAEs of 3.08 dB. DL estimation using combined layers slightly improved the choroid in the estimation of MD ( P <0.01) and had comparable performance with RPC and superficial layers. It also slightly improved RPC, superficial and choroidal layer in the estimation of TDs ( P <0.01).
Conclusions
DL models from OCTA images demonstrated high accuracy in estimating 24-2 VF maps by leveraging information from ONH layers. By extending the application of DL to OCTA images using RPC or superficial layers, it may be possible to reduce the frequency of VF testing to individual patients.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts6
Deep learning (DL) models demonstrated high accuracy in estimating 24-2 visual field (VF) maps from optic nerve head (ONH) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) en face images, leveraging information from the parapapillary area.
Deep learning (DL) models outperformed linear regression (LR) estimates for the estimation of 24-2 visual field (VF) values using individual and combined optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) layers (P <0.001).
For the estimation of mean deviation (MD) using radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images, deep learning (DL) achieved an R of 0.79 and mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 1.77 dB.
Average estimated total deviations (TDs) using radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images had an R of 0.63 and mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 3.08 dB with deep learning (DL) models.
Deep learning (DL) estimation using combined optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) layers slightly improved the choroid in the estimation of mean deviation (MD) (P <0.01) and had comparable performance with radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) and superficial layers.
Deep learning (DL) estimation using combined optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) layers slightly improved radial peripapillary capillary (RPC), superficial, and choroidal layers in the estimation of total deviations (TDs) (P <0.01).
Related Articles5
Evaluation of visual function and OCT parameters in ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy: a longitudinal study.
Cohort StudyPrimary Visual Pathway Changes in Individuals With Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Case-Control StudyEvaluating glaucoma in myopic eyes: Challenges and opportunities.
ReviewRetinal Perfusion and Injury in Sepsis and after Major Surgery.
Observational StudyComparison of structure-function correlation among IMO visual function analyser and Humphrey field analyser.
Cross-Sectional StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.