Inflammation and patient satisfaction in micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation.

Background/aims: This work aims to clarify whether micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MPCPC) is gentler in terms of postoperative inflammation and is better tolerated compared with continuous wave cyclophotocoagulation (CWCPC).

Methods

Prospective, randomised controlled, interventional, single-centre trial performed at the Ludwig Maximilians University Munich from January 2020 to July 2023. In all patients, a laser flare meter was used to measure anterior chamber flare (ACF). Central macular thickness (CMT) was assessed using optical coherence tomography. To quantify pain perception and quality of life (QoL), patients completed the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Glaucoma Activity Limitation 9 questionnaire.

Results

60 eyes of 60 patients were included, with 30 eyes in the MPCPC group and 30 eyes in the CWCPC group. A significantly higher increase in ACF was found after CWCPC as compared with MPCPC at 1 day (p=0.004) and 1 week after surgery (p=0). ACF values equalised at week 6 (p=0.270) and month 3 (p=0.610). The increase in ACF at week 1 did not show a significant correlation with the final decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP, p=0.465). Moreover, the CWCPC group showed a markedly higher increase in CMT (165.5 (15-354) µm vs 55.8 (24-141) µm). VAS and QoL scores did not show to be significantly different.

Conclusions

Compared with MPCPC, patients treated with CWCPC presented with more marked ACF only in the early postoperative period. ACF did not correlate with final IOP. CWCPC and MPCPC are equally well tolerated in terms of pain perception and QoL, but CWCPC may cause more severe inflammatory macular oedema.