Intravitreal Steroids Compared with Anti-VEGF Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Meta-Analysis.
Patil Nikhil S, Mihalache Andrew, Hatamnejad Amin, Popovic Marko M, Kertes Peter J, Muni Rajeev H
AI Summary
This meta-analysis found intravitreal steroids and anti-VEGF for DME yield similar vision outcomes, but steroids reduce retinal thickness more while increasing IOP risk, guiding treatment choices.
Abstract
Topic: Diabetic macular edema (DME) can be treated with either intravitreal anti-VEGF injections or intravitreal corticosteroid injections.
Clinical relevance
We provide an updated meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy and safety of intravitreal steroids and anti-VEGF agents for DME.
Methods
A systematic search was performed on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials from January 2005 to November 2021. Inclusion criteria included published randomized clinical trial data comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal steroids versus anti-VEGF agents for DME. Nonrandomized, noncomparative, and non-English studies were excluded.
Results
Fourteen randomized clinical trials reporting on 827 eyes were included. Between these 2 treatments, our analysis revealed no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes at 3 months (P = 0.11), 6 months (P = 0.21), 12 months (P = 0.24), and final follow-up (P = 0.91). Retinal thickness was significantly lower with steroid treatment at 3 months (P = 0.04), 6 months (P < 0.00001), and final follow-up (weighted mean difference = 39.99 μm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.58,65.41; P = 0.002); however, there was no significant difference at 12 months (P = 0.18). Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents were associated with a lower incidence of intraocular pressure-related adverse events (risk ratio = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.05, 0.34; P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference between comparators for other adverse events, including cataract-related adverse events (P = 0.22).
Conclusions
Overall, intravitreal steroid treatment for DME was associated with no significant differences in BCVA, a significantly lower retinal thickness, and a higher risk of intraocular pressure-related events. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate and the analysis was limited by heterogeneity. Our results reinforce the importance of a continual reevaluation of the role of intravitreal steroids in DME management.
Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
There was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes between intravitreal steroid treatment and anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) at 3 months (P = 0.11), 6 months (P = 0.21), 12 months (P = 0.24), and final follow-up (P = 0.91).
Retinal thickness was significantly lower with intravitreal steroid treatment compared to anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) at 3 months (P = 0.04), 6 months (P < 0.00001), and final follow-up (weighted mean difference = 39.99 μm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.58, 65.41; P = 0.002); however, there was no significant difference at 12 months (P = 0.18).
Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents were associated with a lower incidence of intraocular pressure-related adverse events compared to intravitreal steroid treatment for diabetic macular edema (risk ratio = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.05, 0.34; P < 0.00001).
There was no significant difference between intravitreal steroids and anti-VEGF agents for other adverse events, including cataract-related adverse events (P = 0.22), in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.
A systematic search for studies comparing intravitreal steroids versus anti-VEGF agents for diabetic macular edema was performed on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials from January 2005 to November 2021, including published randomized clinical trial data.
Related Articles5
The 0.19-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant Reduces Treatment Burden in Diabetic Macular Edema.
Observational StudyExtended real-world experience with the ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide) implant in the United Kingdom: 3-year results from the Medisoft® audit study.
Observational StudyRandomized, Double-Masked Trial of Netarsudil 0.02% Ophthalmic Solution for Prevention of Corticosteroid-Induced Ocular Hypertension.
Randomized Controlled TrialComparing intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and bevacizumab injections for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema: a randomized double-blind study.
Randomized Controlled TrialCataract formation and other complications of intravitreal triamcinolone for macular edema.
Case SeriesIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.