Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciSeptember 20250 citations

Novel Grm6 Variant in a no b-wave (nob) Mouse Model: Phenotype Characterization and Gene Therapy.

Lin Pei-Hsuan, Kang Eugene Yu-Chuan, Makrides Neoklis, Lee Winston, Tseng Yun-Ju, Wu Pei-Liang, Peregrin John, Sherman Emmet, Wang Jason Hunghsuan, Swayne Theresa C


AI Summary

This study characterized a new Grm6-variant mouse model of night blindness. Gene therapy restored protein expression but offered limited functional improvement, highlighting the need for early, efficient treatment strategies.

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize a no b-wave (nob) mouse model of congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) caused by a Grm6 variant that disrupts photoreceptor-to-bipolar cell signaling. Additionally, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of gene therapy in restoring visual function.

Methods

The nob mouse was generated through selective breeding to regenerate the nob phenotype. Adeno-associated viruses encoding Grm6 and GFP, driven by two promoters (hGRM6 and CMV), were administered to nob mice at postnatal days 5 (P5) and 30 (P30), respectively. Electroretinography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were conducted three months after gene therapy.

Results

The nob phenotype was successfully regenerated, and a homozygous missense variant c.1037G>A (p.Arg346His) in Grm6 was identified as the causal variant. Scotopic b waves were absent, whereas a waves remained normal, indicating intact rod function but impaired bipolar cell function. SD-OCT revealed thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer and outer plexiform layer (OPL) in affected mice. Immunofluorescence and immunoblotting revealed decreased mGluR6 levels and associated signaling proteins. Gene therapy restored mGluR6 expression and reestablished synaptic protein localization in the OPL, although improvements in b/a ratios and OPL thickness were modest. Notably, the hGRM6 promoter at P5 was more effective at restoring OPL.

Conclusions

We identified a new nob mouse model that mimics the CSNB phenotype in human patients. Whereas gene therapy successfully restored mGluR6 expression, functional improvements were limited. Early treatment using a specific promoter is critical, and increasing transduction efficiency may improve gene therapy strategies.


MeSH Terms

AnimalsGenetic TherapyMiceElectroretinographyDisease Models, AnimalMyopiaPhenotypeEye Diseases, HereditaryReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateTomography, Optical CoherenceNight BlindnessGenetic Diseases, X-LinkedDependovirusRetinal Bipolar CellsMice, Inbred C57BLMaleFemale

Key Concepts6

A homozygous missense variant c.1037G>A (p.Arg346His) in Grm6 was identified as the causal variant for the nob phenotype in the regenerated nob mouse model.

MechanismBasic ScienceGenetic Characterizationn=regenerated nob mouse modelCh8Ch9

Electroretinography in the nob mouse model showed absent scotopic b waves and normal a waves, indicating intact rod function but impaired bipolar cell function.

DiagnosisBasic SciencePhenotype Characterizationn=nob miceCh5Ch7

Gene therapy using adeno-associated viruses encoding Grm6 and GFP, driven by two promoters (hGRM6 and CMV), restored mGluR6 expression and reestablished synaptic protein localization in the outer plexiform layer (OPL) of nob mice.

TreatmentBasic ScienceIntervention Studyn=nob miceCh28Ch35

Improvements in b/a ratios and outer plexiform layer (OPL) thickness were modest in nob mice treated with gene therapy using adeno-associated viruses encoding Grm6 and GFP.

TreatmentBasic ScienceIntervention Studyn=nob miceCh28Ch35

Early treatment at postnatal day 5 (P5) using the hGRM6 promoter was more effective at restoring the outer plexiform layer (OPL) in nob mice treated with gene therapy.

TreatmentBasic ScienceIntervention Studyn=nob miceCh28Ch35

A no b-wave (nob) mouse model of congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) was generated through selective breeding.

MethodologyBasic ScienceAnimal Model Generationn=nob mouse modelCh8Ch9

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.