Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaFebruary 20260 citations

Macula Spatial Patterns and their Association with Central Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma using Artificial Intelligence.

Mahmoudinezhad Golnoush, Moghimi Sasan, Pawar Varun, Cheng Jiacheng, Walker Evan, Beheshtaein Siavash, Yong Yu Xuan, Beheshtaein Soroosh, Alam Naimul A, Parupudi V S Raghu


AI Summary

AI identified 11 distinct macular thinning patterns, outperforming global thickness in predicting central visual field progression. This improves individualized glaucoma risk assessment and management.

Abstract

Purpose

To provide spatial patterns of ganglion cell complex thickness and assess their associations with central visual field progression in glaucoma.

Methods

Macular patterns from the ganglion cell complex were determined using an artificial intelligence algorithm termed archetypal analysis (AA). The diagnostic accuracy of spatial patterns for detecting 10-2 central visual field progression in eyes with a minimum of five 10-2 visual field tests was calculated and compared with the mean global ganglion cell complex thickness. Eyes with progression on either of two trend-based methods (significant MD slope <-0.5 dB/year or clustered pointwise linear regression) were classified as 'progressors'.

Results

A total of 4031 macular scans of 1093 eyes (611 patients) were included, with a mean (SD) age of 67.8 (12.7) years. Eleven distinct spatial patterns were identified. While the macular vulnerable zone was preferentially affected in four patterns, most of the less vulnerable zones were preserved. The AA models at baseline achieved AUROC (0.73 [95% CI 0.62-0.84]) and outperformed global ganglion cell complex thickness (0.55 [95% CI 0.46-0.61], P=0.01) for predicting central VF progression in eyes with early disease at baseline. The AA models AUROC (0.70 [95% CI 0.59-0.80]) also outperformed ganglion cell complex thickness (0.55 [95% CI 0.48-0.60], P=0.02) for predicting central VF progression across all severities.

Conclusions

Using unsupervised artificial intelligence, characteristic patterns of macular thinning were identified and associated with central visual field progression. Spatial macular pattern analysis may enhance individualized care and improve risk stratification for those at risk of central VF damage.


Key Concepts4

The archetypal analysis (AA) models at baseline achieved an AUROC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.62-0.84) for predicting central visual field progression in eyes with early glaucoma at baseline, outperforming global ganglion cell complex thickness (AUROC 0.55 [95% CI 0.46-0.61], P=0.01).

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=4031 macular scans of 1093 eyesCh6Ch7

The archetypal analysis (AA) models achieved an AUROC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.59-0.80) for predicting central visual field progression across all severities of glaucoma, outperforming global ganglion cell complex thickness (AUROC 0.55 [95% CI 0.48-0.60], P=0.02).

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=4031 macular scans of 1093 eyesCh6Ch7

An artificial intelligence algorithm termed archetypal analysis (AA) identified eleven distinct spatial patterns of ganglion cell complex thickness in 1093 eyes (611 patients) with glaucoma, with a mean (SD) age of 67.8 (12.7) years.

DiagnosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=1093 eyes from 611 patientsCh5Ch6

The diagnostic accuracy of spatial patterns from the ganglion cell complex for detecting 10-2 central visual field progression was calculated and compared with the mean global ganglion cell complex thickness in eyes with a minimum of five 10-2 visual field tests, in a study including 4031 macular scans of 1093 eyes (611 patients).

MethodologyCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=4031 macular scans of 1093 eyesCh5Ch6

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.