Exploration and Application of Multiluminance Mobility Test in Bietti Crystalline Dystrophy.
Chen Yanni, Wu Nan, Meng Xiaohong, Long Yanling, Ren Jiayun, Wang Yu, Liu Xiao, Liu Yong
AI Summary
This study found the MLMT has limited range in advanced Bietti crystalline dystrophy. Preserved central macular structure, not just visual acuity, drives mobility, suggesting MLMT adaptation and structural endpoints are needed for BCD trials.
Abstract
Purpose
This study evaluated the multiluminance mobility test (MLMT) as a functional vision assessment tool for Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) and explored its relationship with structural and visual function parameters.
Methods
A retrospective study of 34 BCD patients (67 eyes) incorporated 2 additional low light levels (0.1 and 0.5 lux) into the MLMT. Visual function assessments included best-corrected visual acuity, visual field (VF), and microperimetry (MP). Macular structure was evaluated via spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. MLMT performance was correlated with these parameters using Spearman's rank correlation tests.
Results
Despite severe global photoreceptor dysfunction, a notable proportion of participants (38.8%) passed the MLMT at 1 lux or less, with 23.9% reaching the lowest luminance (0.1 lux). MLMT lux scores correlated significantly with best-corrected visual acuity (ρ = -0.5322; P = 0.0012), mean defect of VF (ρ = -0.5919; P = 0.0005), and mean macular sensitivity of MP (MS-MP; ρ = 0.7175; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that subjects with preserved foveal ellipsoid zone had significantly higher MLMT lux scores and better MS-MP (both P < 0.05) than those with ellipsoid zone atrophy. Although visual function parameters were markedly impaired in certain patients, their MLMT performance remained relatively favorable.
Conclusions
The standardized MLMT has a limited range for assessing advanced BCD. Preservation of central macular structure, rather than visual acuity alone, appears to be critical for mobility performance in BCD patients. Disease-specific adaptations of functional end points are needed for BCD clinical trials.
Translational relevance: To assess functional vision for BCD, the MLMT requires adaptation, and clinical trials should incorporate macular structural parameters.
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
A retrospective study of 34 Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) patients (67 eyes) evaluating the multiluminance mobility test (MLMT) found that 38.8% of participants passed the MLMT at 1 lux or less, with 23.9% reaching the lowest luminance (0.1 lux), despite severe global photoreceptor dysfunction.
In a retrospective study of 34 Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) patients (67 eyes), MLMT lux scores correlated significantly with best-corrected visual acuity (ρ = -0.5322; P = 0.0012), mean defect of visual field (VF) (ρ = -0.5919; P = 0.0005), and mean macular sensitivity of microperimetry (MS-MP) (ρ = 0.7175; P < 0.0001).
Subgroup analysis in a retrospective study of 34 Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) patients (67 eyes) revealed that subjects with preserved foveal ellipsoid zone had significantly higher MLMT lux scores and better mean macular sensitivity of microperimetry (MS-MP) (both P < 0.05) than those with ellipsoid zone atrophy.
A retrospective study of 34 Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) patients (67 eyes) concluded that the standardized multiluminance mobility test (MLMT) has a limited range for assessing advanced BCD.
A retrospective study of 34 Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) patients (67 eyes) found that preservation of central macular structure, rather than visual acuity alone, appears to be critical for mobility performance in BCD patients.
Related Articles5
Circular Contrast Perimetry via Web Application: A Patient Appraisal and Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry.
Cross-Sectional StudyPatient-Reported Symptoms Demonstrating an Association with Severity of Visual Field Damage in Glaucoma.
Cross-Sectional StudyExtent of transverse sinus stenosis does not predict visual outcomes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Observational StudyAssociation of Patterns of Glaucomatous Macular Damage With Contrast Sensitivity and Facial Recognition in Patients With Glaucoma.
Cohort StudyMacular Damage in Glaucoma is Associated With Deficits in Facial Recognition.
Cross-Sectional StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.