Efficacy of Latanoprostene Bunod 0.024% Compared With Timolol 0.5% in Lowering Intraocular Pressure Over 24 Hours.
John H K Liu, John R Slight, Jason L Vittitow, Sforzolini Baldo Scassellati, Robert N Weinreb
Summary
During the nocturnal period, latanoprostene bunod caused more IOP reduction and more increase of ocular perfusion pressure than timolol.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare the diurnal and nocturnal effects of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% solution with timolol maleate 0.5% solution on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure.
DESIGN
Prospective, open-label randomized crossover trial.
METHODS
Twenty-five patients (aged 43-82 years) with ocular hypertension or early primary open-angle glaucoma were enrolled. Baseline IOP and blood pressure were measured in a sleep laboratory every 2 hours in the sitting and supine positions during the 16-hour diurnal/wake period and in the supine position during the 8-hour nocturnal/sleep period. Subjects were randomly assigned to bilateral treatments of latanoprostene bunod at 8 PM or timolol at 8 AM and 8 PM. The second laboratory recording occurred after the 4-week treatment. Subjects were crossed over to the comparator treatment for 4 weeks before the third laboratory recording. Mean IOP and calculated ocular perfusion pressure were compared for the diurnal and nocturnal periods.
RESULTS
Twenty-one subjects completed the study. Both treatments reduced diurnal sitting and supine IOP compared to baseline by 2.3-3.9 mm Hg (all P < .001) with no statistically significant difference between the 2 treatments. Nocturnal IOP under latanoprostene bunod treatment was 2.5 ± 3.1 mm Hg (mean ± SD) less than baseline (P = .002) and 2.3 ± 3.0 mm Hg less than timolol treatment (P = .004). Latanoprostene bunod treatment resulted in greater diurnal sitting and supine ocular perfusion pressures compared with baseline (P ≤ .006) and greater nocturnal ocular perfusion pressure compared with timolol treatment (P = .010).
CONCLUSIONS
During the nocturnal period, latanoprostene bunod caused more IOP reduction and more increase of ocular perfusion pressure than timolol.
More by John H K Liu
View full profile →Top Research in IOP & Medical Therapy
Browse all →The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.