Aqueous outflow facility after phacoemulsification with or without goniosynechialysis in primary angle closure: a randomised controlled study.
Ian A Rodrigues, Pouya Alaghband, Agullo Laura Beltran, Elizabeth Galvis, Stephanie Jones, Rahat Husain, K Sheng Lim
Summary
Eyes randomised to both surgical groups had similar and good outcomes at 6 months in this pilot study.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Goniosynechialysis (GSL) to remove peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) alongside standard cataract surgery has potential theoretical advantages, Published randomised trials, however, have not shown conclusive functional benefits and aqueous outflow changes following GSL are unknown. This study aimed to compare electronic Shiøtz tonographic aqueous outflow facility (TOF) following phacoemulsification with or without GSL in patients with primary angle closure (PAC) and PAC glaucoma. Secondary outcomes were changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and use of glaucoma medications.
METHODS
Prospective randomised pilot study of 26 patients on glaucoma medication, with ≥90° PAS and significant lens opacity. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation only (phaco) or phacoemulsification with IOL plus GSL (phaco-GSL).
RESULTS
Fourteen patients were randomised to phaco-GSL and 12 to phaco alone. TOF increased with phaco-GSL from 0.099±0.07 μL/min/mm Hg to 0.194±0.07, μL/min/mm Hg, p=0.0006, while the phaco group showed no significant change. IOP reduced in both groups, but reduced significantly more following phaco-GSL (46.0%) compared with phaco alone (27.6%, p=0.04). Medication use and extent of PAS only reduced with phaco-GSL, from 0.923±0.86 to 0.384±0.18 medications, p=0.0279, and from 249.2±83.4 to 110.8±53.9° PAS, 6 months postoperatively. No serious adverse events occurred in either group.
CONCLUSIONS
Eyes randomised to both surgical groups had similar and good outcomes at 6 months in this pilot study. However, only eyes undergoing GSL combined with standard phacoemulsification had significantly increased TOF, reduced glaucoma medication dependence and PAS postoperatively. GSL should therefore be considered in such patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT00719290, Results.
Keywords
More by Ian A Rodrigues
View full profile →Phacoemulsification Combined With Endoscopic Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Poorly Controlled Glaucoma: A Comparative Case Series.
Comparing the Effectiveness of Phacoemulsification + Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation Laser versus Phacoemulsification Alone for the Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in Patients with Cataract (CONCEPT): Study Methodology.
Re: Li et al.: Comparative effectiveness of first-line medications for primary open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (Ophthalmology 2016;123:129-40).
Top Research in IOP & Medical Therapy
Browse all →The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.