The Relationship between the Waveform Parameters from the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Progression of Glaucoma.
Shuichiro Aoki, Hiroshi Murata, Masato Matsuura, Yuri Fujino, Shunsuke Nakakura, Yoshitaka Nakao, Yoshiaki Kiuchi, Ryo Asaoka
Summary
Ocular Response Analyzer waveform parameters were correlated significantly with glaucomatous VF progression and showed a stronger than correlation with VF progression than CH.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To investigate the usefulness of waveform parameters measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY) in assessing the progression of glaucomatous visual field (VF).
DESIGN
Observational cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS
One hundred and one eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma in 68 patients with 8 reliable VFs using the Humphrey Field Analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA).
METHODS
The mean of total deviation (mTD) value of the 52 test points in the 24-2 Humphrey Field Analyzer VF test pattern was calculated, and the progression rate of mTD was determined using 8 VFs. Ocular Response Analyzer measurement was performed 3 times in the same day, and the average values of the 3 measurements were used in the analysis. Then, the optimal linear mixed model was selected using 7 parameters: age, mean and standard deviation of intraocular pressure with the Goldmann applanation tonometry during the observation period, central corneal thickness, axial length, mTD in the initial VF, and corneal hysteresis (CH) other than waveform parameters, henceforth known as the basic model. In addition, using the 37 waveform parameters, the optimal model for the mTD progression rate was identified, according to the second-order bias-corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) index, using 15 preselected waveform parameters with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (henceforth known as the waveform model).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Optimal linear mixed models for the mTD progression rate, as determined by AICc index.
RESULTS
The mean ± standard deviation mTD progression rate was -0.25±0.31 dB/year. The basic model was mTD progression rate = -0.94 + 0.075 × CH (AICc = 46.71). The waveform model was mTD progression rate = 1.25 - 0.066 × path2 - 0.000099 × p2area + 0.0021 × mslew2 (AICc = 44.95). The relative likelihood of the latter model being the optimal model was 6.23 times greater than that of the former model.
CONCLUSIONS
Ocular Response Analyzer waveform parameters were correlated significantly with glaucomatous VF progression and showed a stronger than correlation with VF progression than CH.
More by Shuichiro Aoki
View full profile →Investigating the usefulness of a cluster-based trend analysis to detect visual field progression in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
Estimating the Reliability of Glaucomatous Visual Field for the Accurate Assessment of Progression Using the Gaze-Tracking and Reliability Indices.
Biomechanical Glaucoma Factor and Corneal Hysteresis in Treated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Their Associations With Visual Field Progression.
Top Research in Visual Field
Browse all →Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.