Differences in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness as Assessed on the Disc Center and Bruch's Membrane Opening Center in Myopic Eyes.
Summary
There was a significant amount of difference in the sectorial cpRNFLT acquired on the disc center and that acquired on the BMO center in the myopic eyes, which was considered to be derived from unique optic disc margin anatomy in these eyes.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To investigate the difference in circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (cpRNFLT) assessed on the conventional, clinically identified optic disc center and Bruch's membrane opening (BMO) center in myopic eyes.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS
One hundred nine eyes of 109 healthy myopic subjects with axial length of 24 mm or more.
METHODS
The cpRNFLT was acquired on the disc center and BMO center aligned with the fovea. The global and sectorial cpRNFLT were computed in each eye and were compared between the 2 assessments. Furthermore, factors associated with the difference in cpRNFLT between the 2 assessments were analyzed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Differences in cpRNFLT assessed on the disc center and BMO center in myopic eyes.
RESULTS
Among the included participants, the mean SE was -4.94±1.69 D, and the mean axial length was 25.55±0.89 mm. The global cpRNFLT was not significantly different between the 2 assessments; however, the temporal sector was significantly thicker, and the nasal sector was significantly thinner in the assessment on the disc center than on the BMO center (P < 0.0001 for both). Forty eyes (36.7%) exhibited more than 10 μm of difference between the 2 assessments in the temporal sector. The positions of the superior and inferior peaks of the cpRNFLT profile deviated temporally significantly in the disc-center assessment (P < 0.0001 for both). Multiple regression analysis showed that the width of γ-zone parapapillary atrophy (PPA) was associated significantly with greater difference in sectorial cpRNFLT between the 2 assessments.
CONCLUSIONS
There was a significant amount of difference in the sectorial cpRNFLT acquired on the disc center and that acquired on the BMO center in the myopic eyes, which was considered to be derived from unique optic disc margin anatomy in these eyes. The eyes with wider γ-zone PPA exhibited greater cpRNFLT difference. The cpRNFLT data based on the BMO center were acquired at an anatomically accurate location, which indicated that the conventional disc-center assessment induced a substantial amount of error. The present results emphasize the importance of assessing cpRNFLT on the BMO center in myopic eyes for an improved structure-function relationship.
More by Yu Sawada
View full profile →Multiple Temporal Lamina Cribrosa Defects in Myopic Eyes with Glaucoma and Their Association with Visual Field Defects.
Optic Disc Margin Anatomic Features in Myopic Eyes with Glaucoma with Spectral-Domain OCT.
Focal Lamina Cribrosa Defect in Myopic Eyes With Nonprogressive Glaucomatous Visual Field Defect.
Top Research in Optic Nerve & Disc
Browse all →Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.