Conversion of Flow-restrictive Ahmed Glaucoma Valve to a Nonrestrictive Drainage Implant by Slicing the Valve Leaflets: An In Vitro Study.
Sirisha Senthil, Gaddam Manoj Kumar, Harsha Chittajallu Sai Naga Sri, Nikhil S Choudhari, Chandrasekar Garudadri, Ashutosh Richhariya
Summary
It was possible to convert the flow-restrictive AGV into a non-flow-restrictive device by destroying the functionality of the valve leaflets. The pressure of the AGVs was similar to AADI after destroying its valve functionality.
Abstract
PRECIS
With a newly designed blade, slicing of the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) leaflets helped to convert the flow-restrictive AGV into a non-flow-restrictive device. Flow characteristics by our in-vitro study confirmed the loss of resistance of AGV valve leaflets.
PURPOSE
To describe a new blade to destroy the valve leaflets of AGV and to report the in-vitro flow characteristics of AGV after valve destruction.
METHODS
All the newly opened AGV implants and the Aurolab aqueous drainage implants (AADI, used as controls) were tested by connecting to a 27-G cannula, open manometer, digital manometer, and automated infusion pump. Data logging was done using a digital manometer at 4 Hz using computerized software. When the AGV's flow characterization reached the steady phase, their valve functionality was destroyed by disrupting the valve leaflets, using a specially designed blade. The flow characteristics after valve slicing were compared with that of AADI.
RESULTS
A total of 5 FP7 AGVs and 2 AADIs were tested. After initial resistance to flow (5, 8 mm Hg) observed in the case of AADI for 1 to 3 hours, it dropped to 1 mm Hg in both the implants. The flow-restrictive AGV showed 3 distinct phases in the flow characterization. The first phase included the transient phase followed by the steady phase wherein the pressure was 11.2±2.6 (min 7, max 14) mm Hg. The pressure resistance of the AGV dropped significantly (P<0.001) to a mean of 0.4±0.54 mm Hg (1 mm Hg in 2 devices and 0 mm Hg in 3 devices) after the valve functionality was destroyed. The average time taken for this drop in pressure resistance after valve slicing was 10.2±3.0 minutes (min 7, max 15).
CONCLUSIONS
It was possible to convert the flow-restrictive AGV into a non-flow-restrictive device by destroying the functionality of the valve leaflets. The pressure of the AGVs was similar to AADI after destroying its valve functionality.
More by Sirisha Senthil
View full profile →Comparison of the New Low-Cost Nonvalved Glaucoma Drainage Device with Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in Refractory Pediatric Glaucoma in Indian Eyes.
Comparison of Visual Field Progression Rates Among the High Tension Glaucoma, Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma, and Normal Tension Glaucoma.
Outcomes of Silicone Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Refractory Pediatric Glaucoma.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.