Using the Rate of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression in One Eye to Help Assess the Rate in the Fellow Eye.

PURPOSE

Risk factors for visual field progression in glaucoma can affect both eyes, meaning that progression rates (in decibels per year) between eyes likely are correlated. We investigated whether incorporating information about the progression rate in one eye can improve the estimate of the rate in the fellow eye.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed series of 10 visual field results drawn from the Portland Progression Project and the Rotterdam Eye Study.

METHODS

We determined visual field progression rates using linear regression of the summary index mean deviation (MD) over time. We determined best-fitting linear models for the rates over the entire series based on the rate across n visual fields (n = 3 to 6) and used an analysis of variance to determine if incorporating the fellow eye's level of visual field damage (MD) or rate significantly improved these models.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Visual field progression rate (in decibels per year).

RESULTS

Visual field progression rates were correlated positively between eyes for the 262 individuals analyzed (r = 0.51; P 0.61). The fellow eye no longer aided predictions for n = 5 or 6 fields (P = 0.11 and P = 0.42, respectively). Although the coefficient quantifying the influence of the fellow eye's rate changed relatively little for n = 3 to 5 fields, the coefficient for the rate of the eye under consideration increased markedly with the n value.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term rate of visual field change in an eye is, in part, predicted by the rate in the fellow eye, particularly when only a few visual field results are available for each eye. Because of this, apparent rapid progression in an eye is more likely to be real if the fellow eye also seems to be progressing rapidly.