J Cataract Refract Surg
J Cataract Refract SurgSeptember 2021Journal Article

Comparison of refractive outcomes after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery: trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation.

Glaucoma SurgeryIOP & Medical Therapy

Summary

Apart from a significant deviation in short AL eyes, combined cataract surgery and GDD implantation demonstrated no significant postoperative refractive prediction error.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the refractive outcome of combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation compared with trabeculectomy and cataract surgery.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health System, Singapore.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

206 eyes were enrolled for analysis: 50 had combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy (trabeculectomy group), 50 had combined cataract surgery and GDD implantation (GDD group), and 106 had cataract surgery alone (control group). Refractive prediction error and absolute prediction error of each glaucoma surgery group were compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis was performed in the following axial length (AL) subgroups: short (<22.5 mm), medium (≥22.5 to <25.5 mm), and long (≥25.5 mm).

RESULTS

In total, 206 eyes were examined. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall refractive prediction error between the GDD (0.00 ± 0.54 diopters [D]) and the control group (0.10 ± 0.53 D, P = .58). There was significant myopic refractive prediction error in the trabeculectomy group (-0.18 ± 0.88 D, P = .020). In eyes with short AL, a greater absolute prediction error was observed in the GDD group (-0.75 ± 0.43 D, P = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from a significant deviation in short AL eyes, combined cataract surgery and GDD implantation demonstrated no significant postoperative refractive prediction error.

In the Knowledge Library

Discussion

Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.