Distinguishing Healthy From Glaucomatous Eyes With Optical Coherence Tomography Global Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness in the Bottom 5th Percentile.
Zane Z Zemborain, Emmanouil Tsamis, Bruna Sol La, Ari Leshno, Moraes C Gustavo De, Robert Ritch, Donald C Hood
Summary
Quantitative metrics can distinguish between most of the healthy and glaucomatous eyes with low global cpRNFL thickness. However, even the most successful metric, RMS cpRNFL, missed some glaucomatous eyes.
Abstract
PRCIS
Two novel, quantitative metrics, and 1 traditional metric were able to distinguish between many, but not all healthy and glaucomatous eyes in the bottom 5th percentile of global circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness.
PURPOSE
To test the hypothesis that objective optical coherence tomography measures can distinguish between a healthy control with global cpRNFL thickness within the lower 5% of normal and a glaucoma patient with an equivalent cpRNFL thickness.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A total of 37 healthy eyes from over 700 normative eyes fell within the bottom 5th percentile in global cpRNFL thickness. The global cpRNFL thickness of 35 glaucomatous eyes from 188 patients fell within the same range. For the traditional methods, the global cpRNFL thickness percentile and the global ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness percentile for the central ±8 degrees, were calculated for all 72 eyes. For the novel cpRNFL method, the normalized root mean square (RMS) difference between the cpRNFL thickness profile and the global thickness-matched normative thickness profile was calculated. For the superior-inferior (SI) GCL method, the normalized mean difference in superior and inferior GCL thickness was calculated for the central ±8 degrees.
RESULTS
The best quantitative metric, the RMS cpRNFL method, had an accuracy of 90% compared with 81% for the SI GCL and 81% for the global GCL methods. As expected, the global cpRNFL had the worst accuracy, 72%. Similarly, the RMS cpRNFL method had an area under the curve of 0.93 compared with 0.83 and 0.84 for the SI GCL and global GCL methods, respectively. The global cpRNFL method had the worst area under the curve, 0.75.
CONCLUSION
Quantitative metrics can distinguish between most of the healthy and glaucomatous eyes with low global cpRNFL thickness. However, even the most successful metric, RMS cpRNFL, missed some glaucomatous eyes.
More by Zane Z Zemborain
View full profile →Optical Coherence Tomography Can Be Used to Assess Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Damage in Most Eyes With High Myopia.
The OCT RNFL Probability Map and Artifacts Resembling Glaucomatous Damage.
Strategies to Improve Convolutional Neural Network Generalizability and Reference Standards for Glaucoma Detection From OCT Scans.
Top Research in Optic Nerve & Disc
Browse all →Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.