J Glaucoma
J GlaucomaJuly 2022Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Association Between Serum Vitamin D Level and Rates of Structural and Functional Glaucomatous Progression.

Visual FieldOptic Nerve & Disc

Summary

We did not find a significant association between vitamin D level and rates of visual field or RNFL loss over time in individuals with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients.

Abstract

PRCIS

In a retrospective cohort study, serum vitamin D levels were not associated with rates of structural or functional loss in glaucoma patients, suggesting that low vitamin D level is not a risk factor for progression.

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between serum vitamin D level and rates of functional and structural glaucomatous loss over time.

METHODS

This study included 826 eyes of 536 glaucoma or suspect patients with an average follow-up of 4.8±1.9 years. All patients had at least 1 serum vitamin D measurement, and all eyes had at least 2 reliable standard automated perimetry (SAP) tests and 2 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) tests with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the association of vitamin D level with rates of change in SAP mean deviation (MD) and OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness over time while adjusting for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Patients had an average of 3.4±1.7 SAP tests, 4.8±1.9 SD OCT tests, and 2.3±1.9 vitamin D measurements. The average serum vitamin D level was 33.9±13.2 ng/mL. Mean rates of MD and RNFL change were -0.03±0.08 dB/y and -0.68±0.64 µm/y, respectively. After controlling for confounding factors, there was no statistically significant association between mean vitamin D level and rates of MD (β=0.038, 95%

CI

-0.006, 0.082, P =0.09) or RNFL loss over time (β=-0.018, 95%

CI

-0.092, 0.055, P =0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find a significant association between vitamin D level and rates of visual field or RNFL loss over time in individuals with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients.

Discussion

Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.