Comparison of Ganglion Cell Layer and Ganglion Cell/Inner Plexiform Layer Measures for Detection of Early Glaucoma.

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) measurements detect early glaucoma with higher accuracy than ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

The first cohort included 58 glaucomatous eyes with visual field mean deviation (MD) ≥ -6 dB and 125 normal eyes. The second cohort included 72 glaucomatous and 73 normal/glaucoma suspect (GS) eyes with scans able to create GCL/GCIPL deviation maps.

METHODS

In the first cohort, 8 × 8 GCL and GCIPL grids were exported and 5 superior and inferior sectors were defined. Global and sectoral GCL and GCIPL measures were used to predict glaucoma. In the second cohort, proportions of scan areas with abnormal ( 95% and > 99% cutoffs) thicknesses on deviation maps were calculated. The extents of GCL and GCIPL abnormal areas were used to predict glaucoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Extents of abnormal GCL/GCIPL regions and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) for prediction of glaucoma were compared between GCL or GCIPL measures.

RESULTS

The average ± standard deviation MDs were -3.7 ± 1.6 dB and -2.7 ± 1.8 dB in glaucomatous eyes in the first and second cohorts, respectively. Global GCIPL thickness measures (central 18° × 18° macular region) performed better than GCL for early detection of glaucoma (AUROC, 0.928 vs. 0.884, respectively; P = 0.004). Superior and inferior sector 3 thickness measures provided the best discrimination with both GCL and GCIPL (inferior GCL AUROC, 0.860 vs. GCIPL AUROC, 0.916 [P = 0.001]; superior GCL AUROC, 0.916 vs. GCIPL AUROC, 0.900 [P = 0.24]). The extents of abnormal GCL regions at a 1% cutoff in the central elliptical area were 17.5 ± 22.2% and 6.4 ± 10.8% in glaucomatous and normal/GS eyes, respectively, versus 17.0 ± 22.2% and 5.7 ± 10.5%, respectively, for GCIPL (P = 0.06 for GCL and 0.002 for GCIPL). The extents of GCL and GCIPL supernormal regions were mostly similar in glaucomatous and normal eyes. The best performance for prediction of glaucoma in the second cohort was detected at a P value of < 1% within the entire scan for both GCL and GCIPL (AUC, 0.681 vs. 0.668, respectively; P = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Macular GCL and GCIPL thicknesses are equivalent for identifying early glaucoma with current OCT technology. This is likely explained by limitations of inner macular layer segmentation and concurrent changes within the inner plexiform layer in early glaucoma.