Inventory of Ocular Pulse Amplitude Values in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Ophthalmologic Illnesses: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Summary
We found different OPA values characteristic of different clinical entities, with above-normal values in glaucoma and ocular hypertension and lower values in cataract patients.
Abstract
PURPOSE
Many studies have examined the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) to better understand its physiology and clinical relevance, but the papers are scattered, not consistently indexed, and sometimes difficult to locate. We aimed to identify and summarize the relevant published evidence on OPA and, in a meta-analysis, outline specific differences of this parameter between healthy individual, primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and cataract patients.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A thorough literature search and data extraction were conducted by 2 reviewers independently. Reports on OPA measured by the dynamic contour tonometry in conjunction with different ocular and systemic diseases or potential influencing factors were included.
RESULTS
Of the 527 initially found reports, 97 met the inclusion criteria assessing 31 clinical conditions. A meta-analysis based on 6850 eyes and 106 study arms (68.8%) revealed differences in mean OPA values in millimeters of mercury between various entities. Among healthy eyes, the OPA was 2.58 mm Hg (95%
CI
2.45-2.71), whereas OPA values were higher in glaucoma (unspecified glaucoma 2.73 mm Hg, 95%
CI
2.38-3.08; normal-tension glaucoma 2.66 mm Hg, 95%
CI
2.36-2.97; and primary open-angle glaucoma 2.92 mm Hg, 95%
CI
2.75-3.08). Although ocular hypertension showed the highest OPA values (3.53 mm Hg, 95%
CI
3.05-4.01), the lowest values were found in cataract eyes (2.26 mm Hg, 95%
CI
1.57-2.94).
CONCLUSION
We found different OPA values characteristic of different clinical entities, with above-normal values in glaucoma and ocular hypertension and lower values in cataract patients. Our work is intended for clinicians and researchers who want to get a quick overview of the available evidence or who need statistical data on OPA distributions in individual diseases.
Top Research in Glaucoma Surgery
Browse all →Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Efficacy, Safety, and Risk Factors for Failure of Standalone Ab Interno Gelatin Microstent Implantation versus Standalone Trabeculectomy.
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: Two-Year Results.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.