OCT Segmentation Errors with Bruch's Membrane Opening-Minimum Rim Width as Compared with Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness.
Summary
Both BMO-MRW and RNFLT measurements included segmentation errors, which did not seem to have a common location, and may result in differences in glaucoma classification.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare the magnitude and location of automated segmentation errors of the Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT).
DESIGN
Cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS
We included 162 glaucoma suspect or open-angle glaucoma eyes from 162 participants.
METHODS
We used spectral-domain optic coherence tomography (Spectralis 870 nm, Heidelberg Engineering) to image the optic nerve with 24 radial optic nerve head B-scans and a 12-degree peripapillary circle scan, and exported the native "automated segmentation only" results for BMO-MRW and RNFLT. We also exported the results after "manual refinement" of the measurements.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
We calculated the absolute and proportional error globally and within the 12 30-degree sectors of the optic disc. We determined whether the glaucoma classifications were different between BMO-MRW and RNFLT as a result of manual and automatic segmentation.
RESULTS
The absolute error mean was larger for BMO-MRW than for RNFLT (10.8 μm vs. 3.58 μm, P < 0.001). However, the proportional errors were similar (4.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.47). In a multivariable regression model, errors in BMO-MRW were not significantly associated with age, location, magnitude, or severity of glaucoma loss (all P ≥ 0.05). However, larger RNFLT errors were associated with the superior and inferior sector location, thicker nerve fiber layer, and worse visual field (all P < 0.05). Errors in BMO-MRW and RNFLT were not likely to occur in the same sector location (R = 0.001; P = 0.15). With manual refinement, the glaucoma classification changed in 7.8% and 6.2% of eyes with BMO-MRW and RNFLT, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Both BMO-MRW and RNFLT measurements included segmentation errors, which did not seem to have a common location, and may result in differences in glaucoma classification. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Keywords
More by Hongli Yang
View full profile →The connective tissue phenotype of glaucomatous cupping in the monkey eye - Clinical and research implications.
Factors Influencing Central Lamina Cribrosa Depth: A Multicenter Study.
Glaucoma Specialist Optic Disc Margin, Rim Margin, and Rim Width Discordance in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspect Eyes.
Top Research in Optic Nerve & Disc
Browse all →Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.