The PAUL Glaucoma Implant in the management of uveitic glaucoma-3-year follow-up.
Summary
To date, this study represents the first publication looking specifically at the efficacy and safety of the PGI in the management of complex uveitic glaucoma.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
Evaluate the mid-term outcomes of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI) in the management of uveitic glaucoma.
SUBJECTS/METHODS
This was a single-centre, multi-surgeon, retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive cases of PGI for uveitic glaucoma performed between April 2019 and August 2021. Primary outcomes include: complete and qualified success (IOP ≥5 mmHg to ≤21 mmHg with ≥20% IOP reduction) or failure (IOP exceeding the success criteria, additional glaucoma procedures, no perception of light vision). Secondary outcomes included: visual acuity, IOP, medications, complications and intraluminal stent removal.
RESULTS
We included 50 eyes of 41 patients. Mean age was 45.8 ± 19.8 years (range 6-81 years) in this heterogenous and complex cohort. Mean pre-op IOP was 30.6 ± 9.8 mmHg on 3.9 ± 0.9 medications. In total, 62% of patients were on acetazolamide, and 64% required systemic immunosuppression. At final follow-up (mean: 35.8 ± 9.8 months, range 5-58 months), IOP and medications were significantly reduced (12.2 ± 4.4 mmHg, requiring 1.1 ± 1.3 medications, p < 0.0001). Resulting in 48% complete and 92% qualified success rates. Failure occurred in 8% of cases, 6% due to hypertension but only one case of prolonged hypotony (2%).
CONCLUSIONS
To date, this study represents the first publication looking specifically at the efficacy and safety of the PGI in the management of complex uveitic glaucoma. With an average follow-up of 3 years, it shows high levels of complete and qualified success with few complications.
More by Jay Richardson
View full profile →Top Research in IOP & Medical Therapy
Browse all →The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.